• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泮托拉唑对十二指肠-胃-食管反流(DGER)的影响。

Impact of pantoprazole on duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER).

作者信息

Kunsch S, Neesse A, Linhart T, Steinkamp M, Fensterer H, Adler G, Gress T M, Ellenrieder V

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;47(3):277-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027865. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1027865
PMID:19280541
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) is considered as an independent risk factor for complicated reflux disease (GERD). Patients with Barrett's esophagus have significantly higher levels of DGER than patients with uncomplicated GERD. However, the clinical response to conventional high-dose PPI therapy in patients with uncomplicated GERD and DGER is largely unknown.

METHODS

30 patients with uncomplicated GERD and combined pathological reflux (acid and bile) were enrolled in the study. Clinical work-up included evaluation of clinical symptoms, esophageal manometry and upper endoscopy. After 6 - 8 weeks of treatment with Pantoprazole 80 mg/d pH measurement and Bilitec 2000 were repeated, and the pattern of symptoms was re-evaluated.

RESULTS

Under treatment with Pantoprazole 80 mg/d acid reflux was normalised in 28 patients (93 %). Similarly the mean percentage of DGER (time with an absorption greater than 0.14) was significantly reduced from 19.6 % (+/- 13.7) to 5.7 % (+/- 7.7, p < 0.05). In 15 patients (50 %) an elevated DGER persisted under treatment with Pantoprazole (DGER-NR group) whereas in 15 cases (50 %) a normalisation could be achieved (DGER-R group). The DGER-NR group had significantly higher levels of bile reflux before (and under) treatment compared to the DGER-R group: 22.9 % (9.98 %) vs. 15.6 % (0.72 %), respectively. Overall, the median quality of life index (QLI) improved from 4.78 (+/- 0.86) before to 8.04 +/- 1.84) under therapy. The clinical response under treatment was marikedly reduced in the DGER-NR group compared to the DGER-R group: QLI 7.3 vs. 8.9. Particularly heartburn and nocturnal coughing persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that high-dose pantoprazole therapy effectively exerts acid suppression in GERD patients with combined pathological reflux. However, DGER could only normalised in 50 % of patients. High levels of DGER at diagnosis enhance the risk of persistent DGER under PPI therapy and are associated with a reduced clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

十二指肠-胃-食管反流(DGER)被认为是复杂性反流病(GERD)的一个独立危险因素。巴雷特食管患者的DGER水平显著高于非复杂性GERD患者。然而,非复杂性GERD和DGER患者对传统高剂量质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的临床反应在很大程度上尚不清楚。

方法

30例非复杂性GERD合并病理性反流(酸和胆汁)患者纳入本研究。临床检查包括临床症状评估、食管测压和上消化道内镜检查。用泮托拉唑80mg/d治疗6 - 8周后,重复进行pH测量和Bilitec 2000检测,并重新评估症状模式。

结果

在泮托拉唑80mg/d治疗下,28例患者(93%)的酸反流恢复正常。同样,DGER的平均百分比(吸收大于0.14的时间)从19.6%(±13.7)显著降低至5.7%(±7.7,p<0.05)。15例患者(50%)在泮托拉唑治疗下DGER持续升高(DGER未恢复正常组),而15例患者(50%)可实现正常化(DGER恢复正常组)。与DGER恢复正常组相比,DGER未恢复正常组在治疗前(及治疗期间)的胆汁反流水平显著更高:分别为22.9%(9.98%)和15.6%(0.72%)。总体而言,生活质量指数(QLI)中位数从治疗前的4.78(±0.86)提高到治疗期间的8.04(±1.84)。与DGER恢复正常组相比,DGER未恢复正常组治疗后的临床反应明显降低:QLI分别为7.3和8.9。特别是烧心和夜间咳嗽持续存在。

结论

我们的数据证实,高剂量泮托拉唑治疗可有效抑制合并病理性反流的GERD患者的胃酸分泌。然而,只有50%的患者DGER能够恢复正常。诊断时DGER水平高会增加PPI治疗下DGER持续存在的风险,并与临床疗效降低相关。

相似文献

1
Impact of pantoprazole on duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER).泮托拉唑对十二指肠-胃-食管反流(DGER)的影响。
Z Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;47(3):277-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027865. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
2
Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett's esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both?在无巴雷特食管的患者中,单剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗反应不佳的胃食管反流病:是酸反流、胆汁反流,还是两者皆有?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):981-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04171.x.
3
Increased Duodeno-Gastro-Esophageal Reflux (DGER) in symptomatic GERD patients with a history of cholecystectomy.
Z Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;47(8):744-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109176. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
4
Prospective evaluation of duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy.质子泵抑制剂治疗抵抗的胃食管反流病患者十二指肠胃食管反流的前瞻性评估。
Digestion. 2012;86(4):315-22. doi: 10.1159/000342234. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
5
Comparison of the degree of duodenogastroesophageal reflux and acid reflux between patients who failed to respond and those who were successfully treated with a proton pump inhibitor once daily.每日一次使用质子泵抑制剂治疗无效患者与成功治疗患者之间十二指肠胃食管反流程度和酸反流程度的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;104(8):2005-13. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.240. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
6
[Prevalence of a pathological DGER (duodeno-gastric-oesophageal reflux) in patients with clinical symptoms of reflux disease].[反流性疾病临床症状患者中病理性十二指肠-胃-食管反流的患病率]
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 May;46(5):409-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027156. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
7
Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: results of medical treatment and antireflux surgery.十二指肠胃食管反流:药物治疗与抗反流手术的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jan-Feb;55(81):120-6.
8
[Is duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux just a bystander of acid reflux?].十二指肠-胃-食管反流仅仅是胃酸反流的旁观者吗?
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Dec;127(12):1068-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36466.
9
Duodenogastro-esophageal reflux in children with refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease.难治性胃食管反流病患儿的十二指肠-胃-食管反流
J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;151(3):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.024. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
10
Acid and bile reflux in erosive reflux disease, non-erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.糜烂性反流病、非糜烂性反流病和巴雷特食管中的酸和胆汁反流
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Mar-Apr;55(82-83):442-7.

引用本文的文献

1
High Dose Pantoprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Need, Evidence, Guidelines and Our Experience.高剂量泮托拉唑治疗胃食管反流病:需求、证据、指南及我们的经验
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):86-91. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1426.