Siciliano V Iorio, Salvi G E, Matarasso S, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang N P
Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):482-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences.
For this 12-month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered-effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of > or =3 mm, respectively. Peri-implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non-submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12-month follow-up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
All subjects completed the 12-month follow-up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites.
The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of 'complete' osseointegration.
评估即刻经黏膜种植体植入磨牙拔牙位点伴颊侧自含性骨缺损时的软组织愈合情况。
在这项为期12个月的对照临床试验中,15名受试者接受了即刻经黏膜锥形效应(TE)种植体植入,种植位点为磨牙拔牙窝,其颊侧骨缺损(试验位点)的高度和宽度分别≥3mm。种植体周围边缘性骨缺损按照引导骨再生(GBR)原则,采用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质颗粒联合可吸收胶原膜进行治疗。15名受试者在拔牙后愈合的磨牙位点(对照位点)植入种植体,其颊侧牙槽壁完整。总共使用了30枚骨内直径为4.8mm、肩部直径为6.5mm的TE种植体。将瓣复位并缝合,使软组织以非潜入式经黏膜方式愈合。在12个月随访时,分别比较试验位点和对照位点植入种植体的牙周袋探诊深度(PPD)和临床附着水平(CAL)。
所有受试者均完成了12个月的随访期。所有种植体均顺利愈合,存活率为100%。12个月后,与对照位点植入的种植体相比,试验位点植入种植体周围记录到的PPD和CAL值在统计学上显著更高(P<0.05)。
这项对照临床试验的结果表明,在伴有宽而浅的颊侧骨缺损的磨牙拔牙位点即刻经黏膜植入种植体后的愈合情况,与植入愈合位点的种植体相比,效果较差,且导致缺乏“完全”骨结合。