Thorn Clare E, Matcher Stephen J, Meglinski Igor V, Shore Angela C
Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Barrack Rd., Exeter EX2 5AX, United Kingdom.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 May;296(5):H1289-95. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01192.2008. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
Increasingly we are monitoring the distribution of oxygen through the microcirculation using optical techniques such as optical reflectance spectroscopy (ORS) and near-infrared spectroscopy. Mean blood oxygen saturation (S(mb)O(2)) and tissue oxygenation index measured by these two techniques, respectively, evoke a concept of the measurement of oxygen delivery to tissue. This study aims to establish whether S(mb)O(2) is an appropriate indicator of tissue oxygenation. Spontaneous fluctuations in S(mb)O(2) observed as changes in concentration of oxyhemoglobin ([HbO(2)]) and deoxyhemoglobin ([Hb]) were measured by ORS in the skin microcirculation of 30 healthy subjects (15 men, age 21-42 yr). Fourier analysis identified two distinctly different spontaneous falls in S(mb)O(2). The first type of swing, thought to be induced by fluctuations in arterial blood volume, resulted from the effects of respiration, endothelial, sympathetic, and myogenic activity. There was no apparent change in [Hb]. In contrast, a second type of swing resulted from a fall in [HbO(2)] accompanied by a rise in [Hb] and was only induced by endothelial and sympathetic activity. Thus the same fall in S(mb)O(2) can be induced by two distinct responses. A "type I" swing does not suggest an inadequacy in oxygen delivery whereas a "type II" swing may indicate a change in oxygen delivery from blood to tissue. S(mb)O(2) alone cannot therefore be accepted as a definitive marker of tissue oxygenation.
我们越来越多地使用诸如光学反射光谱法(ORS)和近红外光谱法等光学技术来监测氧在微循环中的分布。通过这两种技术分别测量的平均血氧饱和度(S(mb)O(2))和组织氧合指数,引出了测量组织氧输送的概念。本研究旨在确定S(mb)O(2)是否是组织氧合的合适指标。通过ORS测量了30名健康受试者(15名男性,年龄21 - 42岁)皮肤微循环中作为氧合血红蛋白([HbO(2)])和脱氧血红蛋白([Hb])浓度变化观察到的S(mb)O(2)的自发波动。傅里叶分析确定了S(mb)O(2)中两种明显不同的自发下降情况。第一种类型的波动,被认为是由动脉血容量波动引起的,是呼吸、内皮、交感和肌源性活动的结果。[Hb]没有明显变化。相比之下,第二种类型的波动是由[HbO(2)]下降伴随着[Hb]升高引起的,并且仅由内皮和交感活动诱导。因此,相同的S(mb)O(2)下降可以由两种不同的反应诱导。“I型”波动并不表明氧输送不足,而“II型”波动可能表明从血液到组织的氧输送发生了变化。因此,仅S(mb)O(2)不能被视为组织氧合的确定性标志物。