Jia Shuyong, Wang Qizhen, Li Hongyan, Song Xiaojing, Wang Shuyong, Zhang Weibo, Wang Guangjun
Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Nov 26;2021:2431570. doi: 10.1155/2021/2431570. eCollection 2021.
Acupuncture and moxibustion are widely used in clinical practice; however, the differences between their mechanisms are unclear. In the present study, the response of blood perfusion resulting from acupuncture or moxibustion at Ximen (PC4) and its surrounding points was explored. Using the wavelet method, the differences in the frequency interval of blood flux were observed. Furthermore, the correlations between these points were analyzed. The results suggested that moxibustion could significantly improve blood flow perfusion at PC4 compared to acupuncture; however, there was no significant difference around PC4. The response of blood flux at PC4 to different stimulations was related to the frequency V (0.4-1.6 Hz) component. However, a difference in response at other points was not observed. Correlation analysis showed that both acupuncture and moxibustion could cause a decline in the correlation of blood flux signals at these recorded points, but there was no significant difference between these techniques. The results suggested that, at least in the forearm, the acupuncture or moxibustion only influenced the level of blood perfusion locally.
针灸在临床实践中应用广泛;然而,它们作用机制之间的差异尚不清楚。在本研究中,探讨了针刺或艾灸郄门穴(PC4)及其周围穴位所引起的血流灌注反应。采用小波方法,观察了血流频率区间的差异。此外,还分析了这些穴位之间的相关性。结果表明,与针刺相比,艾灸能显著改善郄门穴处的血流灌注;然而,郄门穴周围未观察到显著差异。郄门穴处血流对不同刺激的反应与频率V(0.4 - 1.6 Hz)成分有关。然而,在其他穴位未观察到反应差异。相关性分析表明,针刺和艾灸均可导致这些记录点处血流信号相关性下降,但两种技术之间无显著差异。结果表明,至少在前臂,针刺或艾灸仅局部影响血流灌注水平。