Paes Cilso Dias, Pessoa Bruna Varanda, Jamami Maurício, Di Lorenzo Valéria Amorim Pires, Marrara Kamilla Tays
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
J Bras Pneumol. 2009 Feb;35(2):151-6. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132009000200008.
To compare the reference values for PEF suggested by other authors in 1963, 1989 and 2001 (for populations in the USA, England and Cuba, respectively) with those obtained from a population sample in the city of São Carlos, Brazil, and to determine whether there is concordance among them.
A total of 243 volunteers (123 females and 120 males; 20-70 years of age) participated in the study. The PEF measurements were performed with the volunteer standing, using a nose clip, by means of a portable peak flow meter. These measurements were compared with the reference values using the Friedman test and Dunn's post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Significant differences were found in all age groups from both genders regarding the values predicted in 1989; the same occurred in the 20-30 and 31-40 age groups (both genders), as well as in the 61-70 age group (females only), regarding those predicted in 2001, as well as in the 20-30 age group (males only) regarding those predicted in 1963.
The values predicted in 1963 are appropriate for a population of individuals with the same characteristics as the study sample, except for males in the 20-30 age group. Our study is relevant due to the fact that our sample was larger than that evaluated in the 1963 study. The majority of the values predicted in 1989 and 2001 overestimated the PFE values obtained in our study, proving to be inappropriate for the population studied.
比较其他作者于1963年、1989年和2001年分别针对美国、英国和古巴人群所提出的呼气峰流速(PEF)参考值,与从巴西圣卡洛斯市的人群样本中获得的参考值,并确定它们之间是否一致。
共有243名志愿者(123名女性和120名男性;年龄在20 - 70岁之间)参与了该研究。使用便携式峰值流量计,让志愿者站立并佩戴鼻夹进行PEF测量。使用弗里德曼检验和邓恩事后检验(p < 0.05)将这些测量值与参考值进行比较。
在所有年龄组的男女中,1989年预测的值均存在显著差异;在20 - 30岁和31 - 40岁年龄组(男女均有),以及61 - 70岁年龄组(仅女性)中,2001年预测的值也存在显著差异;在20 - 30岁年龄组(仅男性)中,1963年预测的值存在显著差异。
1963年预测的值适用于与研究样本具有相同特征的人群,但20 - 30岁年龄组的男性除外。由于我们的样本比1963年研究中评估的样本更大,所以我们的研究具有相关性。1989年和2001年预测的大多数值高估了我们研究中获得的呼气峰流速值,事实证明这些值不适用于所研究的人群。