Lubin Amélie, Poirel Nicolas, Rossi Sandrine, Pineau Arlette, Houdé Olivier
UMR 6232 (CI-NAPS), CNRS, CEA, University of Caen and University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;103(3):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
Our previous studies provide some evidence of between-language effects on arithmetic performance in 2-year-olds. French-speaking children were especially biased by the use of the word un as a cardinal value and as an article in the singular/plural opposition (1 vs. the set 2, 3, ...). Here we evaluated the ability of a new action-based assessment method to avoid this bias. A total of 80 French-speaking 2- and 3-year-olds were confronted with impossible (1+1=1 or 1+1=3) and possible (1+1=2) addition problems that triggered the bias. The problems were either presented to the children by the experimenter (onlooker mode) or realized by themselves (actor mode). The 2-year-olds performed better in the actor mode than in the onlooker mode. A subtraction control with no language ambiguity (2-1=2 or 1) was conducted with 80 other children; both modes elicited comparable performances regardless of age. These data indicate that the actor mode is effective for assessing arithmetic ability in French-speaking 2-year-olds.