• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供法医学证据:酷刑记录与沙特阿拉伯的否认态度

Producing medico-legal evidence: documentation of torture versus the Saudi Arabian state of denial.

作者信息

Amris Kirstine, Danneskiold-Samsøe Sofie, Torp-Pedersen Søren, Genefke Inge, Danneskiold-Samsøe Bente

机构信息

The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark.

出版信息

Torture. 2007;17(3):181-95.

PMID:19289891
Abstract

Five British men were detained and allegedly tortured in Saudi Arabia in 2000 and 2001. Two were sentenced to death and three were sentenced to 12 to 18 years of imprisonment. They received clemency in 2003 and were deported to England. After their homecoming, the men have unsuccessfully attempted to sue Saudi Arabian officials who had been responsible for their false accusations and human rights abuses. Saudi Arabia denies any form of torture and ill treatment of the five men, who maintain their allegations against the authorities responsible in Saudi Arabia. This article provides medical documentation of torture of the five British men by comparing: 1. Alleged torture methods, 2. Histories of immediate effects of torture, 3. Objective medical observations using clinical examinations as well as ultrasound scans of the victims' feet. The article concludes that there is a high degree of consistency between the claims of torture and observations, despite Saudi Arabian denial.

摘要

2000年和2001年,五名英国男子在沙特阿拉伯被拘留,据称还遭受了酷刑。其中两人被判处死刑,三人被判处12至18年监禁。他们于2003年获得赦免并被驱逐回英国。回国后,这些人试图起诉应对他们遭受诬告和侵犯人权行为负责的沙特阿拉伯官员,但未成功。沙特阿拉伯否认对这五名男子有任何形式的酷刑和虐待,而这五人坚持对沙特阿拉伯相关当局的指控。本文通过比较以下内容提供了这五名英国男子遭受酷刑的医学记录:1. 所谓的酷刑方法;2. 酷刑的直接影响史;3. 使用临床检查以及对受害者脚部进行超声扫描的客观医学观察。文章得出结论,尽管沙特阿拉伯予以否认,但酷刑指控与观察结果之间存在高度一致性。

相似文献

1
Producing medico-legal evidence: documentation of torture versus the Saudi Arabian state of denial.提供法医学证据:酷刑记录与沙特阿拉伯的否认态度
Torture. 2007;17(3):181-95.
2
Assessment of torture and ill treatment of detainees in Mexico: attitudes and experiences of forensic physicians.墨西哥被拘留者遭受酷刑和虐待情况评估:法医的态度与经历
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2135-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2135.
3
Documentation of torture victims, assessment of the start procedure for medico-legal documentation.酷刑受害者的记录,法医记录起始程序的评估。
Torture. 2007;17(3):196-202.
4
The role of jurisdiction on persistence of torture in Turkey and public reflections.管辖权在土耳其酷刑持续存在及公众反思方面所起的作用。
Torture. 2008;18(1):51-5.
5
Reassessment of the Ireland v. the United Kingdom ECtHR case: A lost opportunity to clarify the distinction between torture and ill-treatment.对爱尔兰诉联合王国欧洲人权法院案的重新评估:一个澄清酷刑与虐待之间区别的错失良机。
Torture. 2019;29(1):56-69. doi: 10.7146/torture.v29i1.110000.
6
Diagnosis of torture after 32 years: assessment of three alleged torture victims during the 1980 military coup in Turkey.32年后对酷刑的诊断:对土耳其1980年军事政变期间三名据称遭受酷刑的受害者的评估。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Nov;244:e42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.08.037. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
7
Military medical torture and denial, redux.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Jul;23(3):243-5. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000844. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Incommunicado detention and torture in Spain, Part II: Enhanced credibility assessment based on the Istanbul Protocol.西班牙的单独监禁与酷刑,第二部分:基于《伊斯坦布尔议定书》的强化可信度评估
Torture. 2016;26(3):8-20.
9
A comparative study of the use of the Istanbul Protocol amongst civil society organizations in low-income countries.低收入国家民间社会组织使用《伊斯坦布尔议定书》的比较研究。
Torture. 2016;26(3):60-73.
10
Medical evidence of human rights violations against non-Arabic-speaking civilians in Darfur: a cross-sectional study.达尔富尔地区非阿拉伯语平民遭受侵犯人权行为的医学证据:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001198. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reported Methods, Distributions, and Frequencies of Torture Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全球酷刑的报告方法、分布和频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36629.