Goh Brian K P, Ooi London L P J, Cheow Peng-Chung, Tan Yu-Meng, Ong Hock-Soo, Chung Yaw-Fui A, Chow Pierce K H, Wong Wai-Keong, Soo Khee-Chee
Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jun;13(6):1071-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0858-y. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
Presently, the need for and choice of preoperative localization tests for insulinomas remain controversial. We report the results from a single institution experience whereby the management policy adopted was that of accurate preoperative localization before surgical exploration.
From 1990 to 2008, 17 patients with a clinical and biochemical diagnosis of an insulinoma who underwent surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of all insulinomas were confirmed pathologically.
All tumors were localized preoperatively and an average of 2.2 preoperative localization studies including 1.4 noninvasive studies and 0.8 invasive studies were utilized per patient. Invasive localization modalities were more sensitive (92%) than noninvasive modalities in localizing insulinomas (71%). Intra-arterial calcium stimulation with hepatic venous sampling was the most sensitive invasive modality (100%), whereas magnetic resonance imaging was the most sensitive noninvasive modality (63%). Fifteen of 17 tumors (88%) were localized intraoperatively via inspection/palpation and/or intraoperative ultrasonography. Both insulinomas which were not localized intraoperatively were localized correctly to the distal pancreas via preoperative transhepatic portal venous sampling. None of the patients required a blind resection or surgical reexploration for failed localization. All 17 patients underwent complete surgical resection which included eight enucleations and nine distal pancreatectomies with a cure rate of 94% (16/17) at a median follow-up of 35 (range, 1-217) months. The postoperative morbidity and long-term outcome of enucleation was similar to distal pancreatectomy despite a higher rate of microscopic margin involvement.
Accurate preoperative localization of insulinomas is useful as it eliminates the need for blind distal pancreatectomy and avoids reoperation. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice, and whenever possible, a pancreas-sparing approach such as enucleation should be adopted.
目前,胰岛素瘤术前定位检查的必要性和选择仍存在争议。我们报告了来自单一机构的经验结果,该机构所采用的管理策略是在手术探查前进行准确的术前定位。
回顾性分析了1990年至2008年间17例经临床和生化诊断为胰岛素瘤并接受手术的患者。所有胰岛素瘤的诊断均经病理证实。
所有肿瘤均在术前定位,每位患者平均进行2.2项术前定位检查,其中包括1.4项非侵入性检查和0.8项侵入性检查。在定位胰岛素瘤方面,侵入性定位方式(92%)比非侵入性方式(71%)更敏感。肝静脉采血的动脉内钙刺激是最敏感的侵入性方式(100%),而磁共振成像则是最敏感的非侵入性方式(63%)。17例肿瘤中有15例(88%)通过术中检查/触诊和/或术中超声定位。术中未定位的2例胰岛素瘤均通过术前经肝门静脉采血正确定位于胰腺远端。没有患者因定位失败而需要进行盲目切除或再次手术探查。所有17例患者均接受了完整的手术切除,其中包括8例摘除术和9例远端胰腺切除术,在中位随访35(范围1 - 217)个月时治愈率为94%(16/17)。尽管显微镜下切缘受累率较高,但摘除术的术后发病率和长期结局与远端胰腺切除术相似。
胰岛素瘤的准确术前定位很有用,因为它消除了盲目进行远端胰腺切除术的必要性并避免了再次手术。完整的手术切除是首选治疗方法,并且只要有可能,应采用保留胰腺的方法,如摘除术。