Guettier Jean-Marc, Kam Anthony, Chang Richard, Skarulis Monica C, Cochran Craig, Alexander H Richard, Libutti Steven K, Pingpank James F, Gorden Phillip
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Apr;94(4):1074-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1986. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
Selective intraarterial calcium injection of the major pancreatic arteries with hepatic venous sampling [calcium arterial stimulation (CaStim)] has been used as a localizing tool for insulinomas at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) since 1989. The accuracy of this technique for localizing insulinomas was reported for all cases until 1996.
The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and track record of the CaStim over time and in the context of evolving technology and to review issues related to result interpretation and procedure complications. CaStim was the only invasive preoperative localization modality used at our center. Endoscopic ultrasound (US) was not studied.
We conducted a retrospective case review at a referral center.
Twenty-nine women and 16 men (mean age, 47 yr; range, 13-78) were diagnosed with an insulinoma from 1996-2008.
A supervised fast was conducted to confirm the diagnosis of insulinoma. US, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CaStim were used as preoperative localization studies. Localization predicted by each preoperative test was compared to surgical localization for accuracy.
We measured the accuracy of US, CT, MRI, and CaStim for localization of insulinomas preoperatively.
All 45 patients had surgically proven insulinomas. Thirty-eight of 45 (84%) localized to the correct anatomical region by CaStim. In five of 45 (11%) patients, the CaStim was falsely negative. Two of 45 (4%) had false-positive localizations.
The CaStim has remained vastly superior to abdominal US, CT, or MRI over time as a preoperative localizing tool for insulinomas. The utility of the CaStim for this purpose and in this setting is thus validated.
自1989年以来,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)一直采用对主要胰动脉进行选择性动脉内钙注射并同时进行肝静脉采样(钙动脉刺激,CaStim)的方法作为胰岛素瘤的定位手段。直到1996年,该技术对胰岛素瘤定位的准确性报告涵盖了所有病例。
本研究旨在评估CaStim随着时间推移以及在技术不断发展背景下的准确性和跟踪记录,并回顾与结果解读及手术并发症相关的问题。CaStim是我们中心唯一使用的侵入性术前定位方法。未对内镜超声(US)进行研究。
我们在一家转诊中心进行了一项回顾性病例分析。
1996年至2008年期间,29名女性和16名男性(平均年龄47岁;范围13 - 78岁)被诊断为胰岛素瘤。
进行了一次有监督的禁食以确诊胰岛素瘤。US、计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和CaStim被用作术前定位检查。将每种术前检查预测的定位与手术定位的准确性进行比较。
我们测量了US、CT、MRI和CaStim术前对胰岛素瘤定位的准确性。
所有45例患者的胰岛素瘤均经手术证实。45例中有38例(84%)通过CaStim定位到正确的解剖区域。45例中有5例(11%)患者CaStim结果为假阴性。45例中有2例(4%)出现假阳性定位。
随着时间推移,作为胰岛素瘤的术前定位工具,CaStim一直远优于腹部US、CT或MRI。因此,CaStim在此目的和这种情况下的实用性得到了验证。