Cavalieri S J, Sanders C C, New C
Department of Medical Microbiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68178.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jul;35(7):1343-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.7.1343.
The ability of beta-lactamase inhibitors to induce class I beta-lactamases in certain organisms in vitro suggests a potential for antagonism in vivo. Therefore, a study was designed to assess the ability of sulbactam and clavulanate to induce beta-lactamases in two strains each of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa both in vitro and in vivo. Induction in vitro was observed only with S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa and generally only when inhibitor concentrations greater than 2 micrograms/ml were examined. A mouse model of lethal infection, designed to detect in vivo antagonism arising from beta-lactamase induction, was used to determine what effect sulbactam and clavulanate would have on the 50% protective doses (PD50s) of cefoperazone and ticarcillin. Antagonism (a significant increase in the PD50) was observed in only 4 of 32 tests. Three of these involved antagonism of cefoperazone by clavulanate, and one involved antagonism of cefoperazone by sulbactam. In 6 of 32 tests, enhancement of efficacy (a significant decrease in PD50) was observed. In four of these, sulbactam enhanced cefoperazone; in one, sulbactam enhanced ticarcillin; and in one, clavulanate enhanced ticarcillin. Four of the six cases of enhancement occurred when the beta-lactamase inhibitor was given at the time of challenge. None of these positive or negative in vivo effects were predicted by in vitro tests. These data suggest that beta-lactamase inhibitors can influence the in vivo potency of their companion drug in both a beneficial and detrimental fashion against organisms with class I beta-lactamases and that these effects cannot be predicted from in vitro assays.
β-内酰胺酶抑制剂在体外可诱导某些细菌产生I类β-内酰胺酶,这提示在体内可能存在拮抗作用。因此,设计了一项研究来评估舒巴坦和克拉维酸在体外和体内对阴沟肠杆菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、粘质沙雷氏菌和铜绿假单胞菌的两个菌株诱导β-内酰胺酶的能力。仅在粘质沙雷氏菌和铜绿假单胞菌中观察到体外诱导,并且通常仅在检测抑制剂浓度大于2微克/毫升时才出现。使用致死性感染小鼠模型来检测由β-内酰胺酶诱导引起的体内拮抗作用,以确定舒巴坦和克拉维酸对头孢哌酮和替卡西林的50%保护剂量(PD50)有何影响。在32项试验中仅4项观察到拮抗作用(PD50显著增加)。其中3项涉及克拉维酸对头孢哌酮的拮抗作用,1项涉及舒巴坦对头孢哌酮的拮抗作用。在32项试验中的6项中,观察到疗效增强(PD50显著降低)。其中4项中,舒巴坦增强了头孢哌酮的疗效;1项中,舒巴坦增强了替卡西林的疗效;1项中,克拉维酸增强了替卡西林的疗效。6例增强中有4例是在攻击时给予β-内酰胺酶抑制剂时出现的。体外试验无法预测这些体内的阳性或阴性效应。这些数据表明,β-内酰胺酶抑制剂可以以有益和有害的方式影响其联合药物对具有I类β-内酰胺酶的细菌的体内效力,并且这些效应无法从体外试验中预测。