• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚心理健康环境中成人结局测量的手语工具验证

Validation of an Australian sign language instrument of outcome measurement for adults in mental health settings.

作者信息

Munro Louise, Rodwell John

机构信息

Faculty of Health, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;43(4):332-9. doi: 10.1080/00048670902721111.

DOI:10.1080/00048670902721111
PMID:19296288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There are currently no adult mental health outcome measures that have been translated into Australian sign language (Auslan). Without a valid and reliable Auslan outcome measure, empirical research into the efficacy of mental health interventions for sign language users is unattainable. To address this research problem the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a measure of general functioning, was translated into Auslan and recorded on to digital video disk for use in clinical settings. The purpose of the present study was therefore to examine the reliability, validity and acceptability of an Auslan version of the ORS (ORS-Auslan).

METHOD

The ORS-Auslan was administered to 44 deaf people who use Auslan as their first language and who identify as members of a deaf community (termed 'Deaf' people) on their first presentation to a mental health or counselling facility and to 55 Deaf people in the general community. The community sample also completed an Auslan version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).

RESULTS

t-Tests indicated significant differences between the mean scores for the clinical and community sample. Internal consistency was acceptable given the low number of items in the ORS-Auslan. Construct validity was established by significant correlations between total scores on the DASS-21-Auslan and ORS-Auslan. Acceptability of ORS-Auslan was evident in the completion rate of 93% compared with 63% for DASS-21-Auslan.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the only Auslan outcome measure available that can be used across a wide variety of mental health and clinical settings. The ORS-Auslan provides mental health clinicians with a reliable and valid, brief measure of general functioning that can significantly distinguish between clinical and non-clinical presentations for members of the Deaf community.

摘要

目的

目前尚无已翻译成澳大利亚手语(Auslan)的成人心理健康结果测量工具。没有有效且可靠的Auslan结果测量工具,就无法对针对手语使用者的心理健康干预措施的效果进行实证研究。为了解决这一研究问题,将通用功能测量工具结果评定量表(ORS)翻译成Auslan,并录制到数字视频光盘上,以供临床环境使用。因此,本研究的目的是检验ORS的Auslan版本(ORS-Auslan)的信度、效度和可接受性。

方法

对44名以Auslan为第一语言且自认为是聋人社区成员(称为“聋人”)的聋人进行了ORS-Auslan测试,这些聋人首次前往心理健康或咨询机构就诊;同时对55名普通社区的聋人也进行了测试。社区样本还完成了Auslan版本的抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(DASS-21)。

结果

t检验表明临床样本和社区样本的平均得分存在显著差异。鉴于ORS-Auslan的项目数量较少,其内部一致性是可以接受的。通过DASS-21-Auslan和ORS-Auslan总分之间的显著相关性建立了结构效度。ORS-Auslan的可接受性在完成率为93%中很明显,而DASS-21-Auslan的完成率为63%。

结论

这是唯一可在各种心理健康和临床环境中使用的Auslan结果测量工具。ORS-Auslan为心理健康临床医生提供了一种可靠、有效的通用功能简短测量工具,可显著区分聋人社区成员的临床和非临床表现。

相似文献

1
Validation of an Australian sign language instrument of outcome measurement for adults in mental health settings.澳大利亚心理健康环境中成人结局测量的手语工具验证
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;43(4):332-9. doi: 10.1080/00048670902721111.
2
[Factor analysis and validation of a Spanish version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in Colombia].[哥伦比亚版简明精神状态评定量表西班牙语版本的因素分析与验证]
Biomedica. 2005 Mar;25(1):120-8.
3
Reading the signs: impact of signed versus written questionnaires on the prevalence of psychopathology among deaf adolescents.解读信号:手语问卷与书面问卷对失聪青少年精神病理学患病率的影响
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;40(8):665-73. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01866.x.
4
A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders.《国家健康结果量表德文版(HoNOS-D)的心理测量学评估:关于临床医生对精神障碍患者严重程度测量的可行性和可靠性》
Psychopathology. 2007;40(2):116-25. doi: 10.1159/000098492. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
5
Admission decisions following contact with an emergency mental health assessment and intervention service.在与紧急心理健康评估和干预服务机构接触后做出的入院决定。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01302.x.
6
A brief measure of vocational activity and community participation: development and reliability of the Activity and Participation Questionnaire.职业活动和社区参与的简要衡量标准:活动和参与问卷的开发和可靠性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;44(3):258-66. doi: 10.3109/00048670903487175.
7
Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.心理健康问题的服务利用情况:2007年全国心理健康与幸福调查结果
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;43(7):615-23. doi: 10.1080/00048670902970858.
8
The validity of the CGI severity and improvement scales as measures of clinical effectiveness suitable for routine clinical use.作为适用于常规临床应用的临床疗效衡量指标,临床总体印象量表(CGI)严重程度和改善量表的有效性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;14(6):979-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00921.x. Epub 2008 May 2.
9
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
10
A psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the psychopathology inventory for mentally retarded adults (PIMRA).一份针对成年智障者精神病理学量表瑞典语版本(PIMRA)的心理测量学评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):183-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.04.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Health outcomes in Deaf signing populations: A systematic review.聋人手语人群的健康结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298479. eCollection 2024.
2
[Deaf patients in psychiatry].[精神病学中的聋人患者]
Neuropsychiatr. 2014;28(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s40211-013-0088-0. Epub 2013 Nov 22.