Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298479. eCollection 2024.
(i) To identify peer reviewed publications reporting the mental and/or physical health outcomes of Deaf adults who are sign language users and to synthesise evidence; (ii) If data available, to analyse how the health of the adult Deaf population compares to that of the general population; (iii) to evaluate the quality of evidence in the identified publications; (iv) to identify limitations of the current evidence base and suggest directions for future research.
Systematic review.
Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, and Web of Science.
The inclusion criteria were Deaf adult populations who used a signed language, all study types, including methods-focused papers which also contain results in relation to health outcomes of Deaf signing populations. Full-text articles, published in peer-review journals were searched up to 13th June 2023, published in English or a signed language such as ASL (American Sign Language).
Supported by the Rayyan systematic review software, two authors independently reviewed identified publications at each screening stage (primary and secondary). A third reviewer was consulted to settle any disagreements. Comprehensive data extraction included research design, study sample, methodology, findings, and a quality assessment.
Of the 35 included studies, the majority (25 out of 35) concerned mental health outcomes. The findings from this review highlighted the inequalities in health and mental health outcomes for Deaf signing populations in comparison with the general population, gaps in the range of conditions studied in relation to Deaf people, and the poor quality of available data.
Population sample definition and consistency of standards of reporting of health outcomes for Deaf people who use sign language should be improved. Further research on health outcomes not previously reported is needed to gain better understanding of Deaf people's state of health.
(i) 识别同行评审出版物,报告使用手语的聋人成年人的心理和/或身体健康结果,并综合证据;(ii) 如果有可用数据,分析成年聋人人口的健康状况与一般人群的健康状况相比如何;(iii) 评估已确定出版物中的证据质量;(iv) 确定当前证据基础的局限性,并为未来研究提出方向。
系统评价。
Medline、Embase、PsychINFO 和 Web of Science。
纳入标准为使用手语的聋人成年人群体,所有研究类型,包括方法重点论文,其中还包含与聋人手语人群健康结果相关的结果。搜索截至 2023 年 6 月 13 日发表在同行评议期刊上的全文文章,以英语或 ASL(美国手语)等手语出版。
由 Rayyan 系统评价软件支持,两名作者在每个筛选阶段(主要和次要)独立审查确定的出版物。如果出现分歧,将咨询第三名审稿人。全面的数据提取包括研究设计、研究样本、方法、发现和质量评估。
在 35 项纳入的研究中,大多数(35 项中的 25 项)涉及心理健康结果。本综述的结果强调了与一般人群相比,手语使用的聋人人群在健康和心理健康结果方面存在不平等,在与聋人有关的研究范围内存在条件差距,以及可用数据质量较差。
应改进手语使用的聋人人群的人口样本定义和报告健康结果的标准的一致性。需要对以前未报告的健康结果进行进一步研究,以更好地了解聋人的健康状况。