• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概念组合中的知觉模拟:来自属性生成的证据。

Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation.

作者信息

Wu Ling-ling, Barsalou Lawrence W

机构信息

Department of Information Management, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Oct;132(2):173-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
PMID:19298949
Abstract

In three experiments, participants received nouns or noun phrases for objects and verbally generated their properties ("feature listing"). Several sources of evidence indicated that participants constructed perceptual simulations to generate properties for the noun phrases during conceptual combination. First, the production of object properties for noun phrases depended on occlusion, with unoccluded properties being generated more often than occluded properties. Because a perceptual variable affected conceptual combination, perceptual simulations appeared central to combining the concepts for modifiers and head nouns. Second, neutral participants produced the same distributions of properties as participants instructed to describe images, suggesting that the conceptual representations used by neutral participants were similar to the mental images used by imagery participants. Furthermore, the property distributions for neutral and imagery participants differed from those for participants instructed to produce word associations. Third, participants produced large amounts of information about background situations associated with the object cues, suggesting that the simulations used to generate properties were situated. The experiments ruled out alternative explanations that simulation effects occur only for familiar noun phrases associated with perceptual memories and that rules associated with modifiers produce occlusion effects. A process model of the property generation task grounded in simulation mechanisms is presented. The possibility of integrating the simulation account of conceptual combination with traditional accounts and well-established findings is explored.

摘要

在三个实验中,参与者收到物体的名词或名词短语,并口头生成其属性(“特征列举”)。多个证据来源表明,参与者在概念组合过程中构建了感知模拟来生成名词短语的属性。首先,名词短语的物体属性生成取决于遮挡情况,未被遮挡的属性比被遮挡的属性生成得更频繁。由于一个感知变量影响了概念组合,感知模拟似乎是组合修饰语和中心名词概念的核心。其次,中立参与者生成的属性分布与被指示描述图像的参与者相同,这表明中立参与者使用的概念表征与意象参与者使用的心理图像相似。此外,中立参与者和意象参与者的属性分布与被指示生成单词联想的参与者不同。第三,参与者生成了大量与物体线索相关的背景情况信息,这表明用于生成属性的模拟是情境化的。这些实验排除了仅与感知记忆相关的熟悉名词短语才会出现模拟效应以及与修饰语相关的规则产生遮挡效应的其他解释。提出了一个基于模拟机制的属性生成任务的过程模型。探讨了将概念组合的模拟解释与传统解释及既定发现相结合的可能性。

相似文献

1
Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation.概念组合中的知觉模拟:来自属性生成的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Oct;132(2):173-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing.功能磁共振成像(fMRI)证据表明,在概念加工中存在词语联想和情境模拟。
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):106-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
3
The development of interpretations for novel noun-noun conceptual combinations during the early school years.小学早期对新颖名词-名词概念组合的理解发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 May;91(1):67-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.12.004.
4
Embodiment of emotion concepts.情感概念的体现
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1120-36. doi: 10.1037/a0015574.
5
Testing two theories of conceptual combination: alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts.检验概念组合的两种理论:组合概念理解与生成中的对齐与诊断性
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):255-71.
6
Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval.在概念的创建和检索中都会出现模态转换成本。
Cogn Sci. 2011 May-Jun;35(4):763-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01168.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
7
On the necessity of alignment: reply to Costello and Keane (2001).关于对齐的必要性:对科斯特洛和基恩(2001年)的回应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):272-7.
8
Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs.感官负荷会产生概念处理成本。
Cognition. 2008 Nov;109(2):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
9
Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances.评估基于言语描述构建的心理意象中的符号距离效应:一项关于距离心理比较中个体差异的研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
10
Comparison and the development of knowledge.知识的比较与发展。
Cognition. 2007 Jan;102(1):118-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.08.001. Epub 2006 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.从语义知识到语义特征:360个概念的法语语义特征生成规范
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02814-z.
2
A Feature-Space Theory of the Production Effect in Recognition.识别中产生效应的特征空间理论。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan;71(1):64-82. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000611.
3
Salient semantics.显著语义
Synthese. 2024;204(2):39. doi: 10.1007/s11229-024-04669-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Conceptual structure of emotions.情绪的概念结构。
Emotion. 2024 Sep;24(6):1550-1561. doi: 10.1037/emo0001327. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
Feats: A database of semantic features for early produced noun concepts.特点:早期生成名词概念的语义特征数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3259-3279. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02242-x. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Consensus Paper: Situated and Embodied Language Acquisition.共识文件:情境化与具身化语言习得
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):63. doi: 10.5334/joc.308. eCollection 2023.
7
Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.六个语言粒度层次上的具身加工:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):60. doi: 10.5334/joc.231. eCollection 2023.
8
AC-PLT: An algorithm for computer-assisted coding of semantic property listing data.AC-PLT:语义属性列表数据的计算机辅助编码算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3366-3379. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02260-9. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
9
Polarizing Plates: Both Omnivores and Vegans Represent In-Group Foods With Eating Simulations.偏光板:杂食者和素食者都通过饮食模拟来代表群体内的食物。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 May;51(5):742-758. doi: 10.1177/01461672231202276. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
The Situated Assessment Method (SAM2): Establishing individual differences in habitual behavior.情境评估法(SAM2):揭示习惯性行为中的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0286954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286954. eCollection 2023.