Ahmed A S, Zellerhoff M, Strother C M, Pulfer K A, Redel T, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Royalty K, Consigny D, Niemann D B
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wis., USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 May;30(5):917-22. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1513. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
Cerebral blood volume (CBV) is an important parameter in estimating the viability of brain tissue following an ischemic event. We tested the hypothesis that C-arm CT measurements of CBV would correlate well with those made with perfusion CT (PCT).
CBV was measured in 12 canines by using PCT and C-arm CT. Two measurements with each technique were made on each animal; a different injection protocol was used for each of these techniques. PCT was performed by using a 64-section V-scanner. C-arm CT was performed by using a biplane Artis dBA system. PCT images were transferred to a commercially available workstation for postprocessing and analysis; C-arm CT images were transferred to a commercially available workstation for postprocessing and analysis by using prototype software. From each animal, 2 sections from each technique were selected for analysis.
There was good agreement of both the color maps and absolute numbers between the 2 techniques. The maximum and mean deviations of values between the 2 techniques for the first 5 animals were 30.20% and 7.82%; for the second 7 animals, these values were 26.79% and 7.40%. The maximum and mean deviations between the 2 C-arm CT studies performed on the first 5 animals were 33.15% and 12.24%; for the second 7 animals, these values were 41.15% and 10.89%.
In these healthy animals, measurement of CBV with C-arm CT compared well with measurements made with PCT.
脑血容量(CBV)是评估缺血事件后脑组织存活能力的重要参数。我们检验了如下假设:C型臂CT测量的CBV与灌注CT(PCT)测量的结果具有良好的相关性。
使用PCT和C型臂CT对12只犬进行CBV测量。对每只动物每种技术各进行两次测量;每种技术使用不同的注射方案。使用64层V型扫描仪进行PCT。使用双平面Artis dBA系统进行C型臂CT。PCT图像传输至商用工作站进行后处理和分析;C型臂CT图像传输至商用工作站,使用原型软件进行后处理和分析。从每只动物的每种技术中各选取2个切片进行分析。
两种技术的色图和绝对值均具有良好的一致性。前5只动物两种技术测量值的最大偏差和平均偏差分别为30.20%和7.82%;后7只动物的这些值分别为26.79%和7.40%。对前5只动物进行的两次C型臂CT研究之间的最大偏差和平均偏差分别为33.15%和12.24%;后7只动物的这些值分别为41.15%和10.89%。
在这些健康动物中,C型臂CT测量的CBV与PCT测量的结果比较吻合。