Costello Fiona, Hodge William, Pan Y Irene, Freedman Mark, DeMeulemeester Christine
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jun 15;281(1-2):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.354. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
To determine whether retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) atrophy in the afferent visual pathway may complement existing tools used to describe and characterize differences across MS subtypes.
Optical coherence tomography-measured RNFL values were compared over two years in 35 patients (70 eyes) with optic neuritis (ON) as a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); 39 patients (78 eyes) with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS); and 7 patients (14 eyes) with secondary progressive MS (SPMS).
RNFL comparisons involving eyes without ON yielded greater differences between MS subtypes than ON-affected eyes. Overall RNFL values in non-affected eyes were reduced in SPMS patients (83.4 microm), relative to CIS (101.2 microm) (p=0.0009), and RRMS patients (103.7 microm) (p=0.001); and temporal RNFL atrophy was greater in RRMS (64.4 microm) eyes as compared to CIS eyes (73.2 microm) (p=0.02). In ON-affected eyes, RNFL atrophy was greater in SPMS patients (39.5 microm) than CIS patients (58.1 microm) (p=0.03), and in RRMS patients (48.2 microm) relative to CIS patients (p=0.05). RNFL values did not change significantly for any MS subtype during the two-year duration of the study.
RNFL thickness may represent a structural marker, which can help distinguish MS subtypes, because the extent of atrophy is commensurate with disease progression. RNFL comparisons between non-affected eyes revealed greater differences between CIS, RRMS, and SPMS patients relative to ON-affected eyes, because the impact of prior ON may supplant the effects of disease subtype.
确定传入视觉通路中的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)萎缩是否可补充现有的用于描述和表征多发性硬化症(MS)各亚型差异的工具。
对35例(70只眼)患有视神经炎(ON)作为临床孤立综合征(CIS)的患者、39例(78只眼)复发缓解型MS(RRMS)患者以及7例(14只眼)继发进展型MS(SPMS)患者的RNFL值进行了为期两年的比较。
与受ON影响的眼睛相比,涉及未患ON的眼睛的RNFL比较在MS各亚型之间产生了更大的差异。与CIS患者(101.2微米)(p = 0.0009)和RRMS患者(103.7微米)(p = 0.001)相比,SPMS患者未受影响眼睛的总体RNFL值降低(83.4微米);与CIS眼睛(73.2微米)相比,RRMS眼睛(64.4微米)的颞侧RNFL萎缩更严重(p = 0.02)。在受ON影响的眼睛中,SPMS患者(39.5微米)的RNFL萎缩比CIS患者(58.1微米)更严重(p = 0.03),RRMS患者(48.2微米)相对于CIS患者更严重(p = 0.05)。在研究的两年期间,任何MS亚型的RNFL值均未发生显著变化。
RNFL厚度可能代表一种结构标志物,有助于区分MS亚型,因为萎缩程度与疾病进展相称。与受ON影响的眼睛相比,未受影响眼睛之间的RNFL比较在CIS、RRMS和SPMS患者之间显示出更大的差异,因为先前ON的影响可能掩盖了疾病亚型的影响。