Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009 Dec;37(3):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s12016-009-8123-4. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
Pulmonary function testing (PFT) serves many purposes in clinical practice, and in contrast to other laboratory measures, PFT results are often provided with a clinical interpretation. PFT interpretation depends on the clinical context, and multiple challenges influence PFT interpretation. Overall, the goal of PFT interpretation is to distinguish normal from abnormal, and this is affected by the selection of reference standards, as well as the arbitrary albeit not necessarily irrational choice of cut-off values. Controversies regarding PFT analysis may lead to important differences in interpretation. In this article, issues associated with the selection of reference standards are discussed, followed by a review of the controversies related to PFT interpretation in the diagnosis of obstructive ventilatory defect, restrictive ventilatory defect, gas transfer defect, and flow-volume loop abnormalities. Given the challenges facing PFT interpretation, no single interpretative algorithm is sufficient; rather, PFT interpretation requires a comprehensive approach including consideration of the clinical context, laboratory methodology, and reference standards and an understanding of the consequences of a normal or abnormal designation.
肺功能测试(PFT)在临床实践中有多种用途,与其他实验室检测相比,PFT 结果通常附有临床解读。PFT 解读取决于临床背景,多种挑战会影响 PFT 解读。总的来说,PFT 解读的目的是区分正常和异常,这受到参考标准的选择以及临界值的任意选择(尽管并非不合理)的影响。PFT 分析方面的争议可能会导致解读上的重要差异。本文讨论了与参考标准选择相关的问题,接着回顾了与阻塞性通气障碍、限制性通气障碍、气体交换缺陷和流量-容积环异常诊断相关的 PFT 解读争议。鉴于 PFT 解读面临的挑战,没有单一的解读算法是足够的;相反,PFT 解读需要一种综合的方法,包括考虑临床背景、实验室方法和参考标准,并了解正常或异常结果的后果。