Drummond Michael B, Schwartz Pamela F, Duggan William T, Teeter John G, Riese Richard J, Ahrens Richard C, Crapo Robert O, England Richard D, Macintyre Neil R, Jensen Robert L, Wise Robert A
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):225-32. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200801-090OC. Epub 2008 May 8.
American Thoracic Society guidelines state that a 10% or greater intersession change in diffusing capacity of the lung (DL(CO)) should be considered clinically significant. However, little is known about the short-term intersession variability in DL(CO) in untrained subjects or how variability is affected by rigorous external quality control.
To characterize the intersession variability of DL(CO) and the effect of different quality control methods in untrained individuals without significant lung disease.
Data were pooled from the comparator arms of 14 preregistration trials of inhaled insulin that included nonsmoking diabetic patients without significant lung disease. A total of 699 participants performed repeated DL(CO) measurements using a highly standardized technique. A total of 948 participants performed repeated measurements using routine clinical testing.
The mean intersession absolute change in DL(CO) using the highly standardized method was 1.45 ml/minute/mm Hg (5.64%) compared with 2.49 ml/minute/mm Hg (9.52%) in the routine testing group (P < 0.0001 for both absolute and percent difference). The variability in absolute intersession change in DL(CO) increased with increasing baseline DL(CO) values, whereas the absolute percentage of intersession change was stable across baseline values. Depending on the method, 15.5 to 35.5% of participants had an intersession change of 10% or greater. A 20% or greater threshold would reduce this percentage of patients to 1 to 10%.
Intersession variability in DL(CO) measurement is dependent on the method of testing used and baseline DL(CO). Using a more liberal threshold to define meaningful intersession change may reduce the misclassification of normal variation as abnormal change.
美国胸科学会指南指出,肺弥散功能(DL(CO))在不同检测时段间变化10%或更多应被视为具有临床意义。然而,对于未经训练的受试者DL(CO)的短期检测时段间变异性,或这种变异性如何受严格的外部质量控制影响,人们知之甚少。
描述未经训练且无明显肺部疾病个体中DL(CO)的检测时段间变异性以及不同质量控制方法的影响。
汇总了14项吸入胰岛素预注册试验的对照臂数据,这些试验纳入了无明显肺部疾病的非吸烟糖尿病患者。共有699名参与者使用高度标准化技术进行了重复的DL(CO)测量。共有948名参与者使用常规临床检测进行了重复测量。
使用高度标准化方法时,DL(CO)检测时段间的平均绝对变化为1.45 ml/分钟/毫米汞柱(5.64%),而常规检测组为2.49 ml/分钟/毫米汞柱(9.52%)(绝对差异和百分比差异均P < 0.0001)。DL(CO)检测时段间绝对变化的变异性随基线DL(CO)值增加而增加,而检测时段间变化的绝对百分比在各基线值间保持稳定。根据方法不同,15.5%至35.5%的参与者检测时段间变化达10%或更多。将阈值提高到20%或更高会使该比例患者降至1%至10%。
DL(CO)测量的检测时段间变异性取决于所使用的检测方法和基线DL(CO)。使用更宽松的阈值来定义有意义的检测时段间变化可能会减少将正常变异误分类为异常变化的情况。