Godden S M, Haines D M, Konkol K, Peterson J
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Apr;92(4):1758-64. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1847.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of method of feeding (nipple bottle vs. esophageal tube feeder) on passive transfer of immunoglobulin (Ig) G when either a large or small volume of colostrum was fed. Newborn bull calves were removed from the dam before suckling and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 colostrum replacer (CR) treatment groups: 1.5 L (100 g of IgG) of CR fed using a nipple bottle (group 1; n = 24); 1.5 L (100 g of IgG) of CR fed using an esophageal tube feeder (group 2; n = 24); 3.0 L (200 g of IgG) of CR fed using a nipple bottle (group 3; n = 24), or 3.0 L (200 g of IgG) of CR fed using an esophageal tube feeder (group 4; n = 25). Blood samples collected at 24 h of age showed that serum IgG levels were significantly greater in calves fed large (3 L) volumes of CR compared with calves fed small (1.5 L) volumes of CR, regardless of feeding method. These differences were attributed to the larger mass of IgG ingested by calves fed 3 L of CR (200 g of IgG) compared with calves fed 1.5 L of CR (100 g of IgG). For calves fed small (1.5 L) volumes of colostrum, serum total protein (TP, g/dL), serum IgG (IgG, mg/mL), acceptable passive transfer rates (APT, %), and apparent efficiency of absorption of IgG (AEA, %) were significantly greater for calves fed with a bottle (TP = 5.3 g/dL; IgG = 12.5 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 51.1%) compared with calves fed with an esophageal tube feeder (TP = 5.0 g/dL; IgG = 9.8 mg/mL; APT = 41.7%; AEA = 40.5%). However, for calves fed large (3 L) volumes of colostrum, there was no difference in passive transfer indices for calves fed with a bottle (TP = 5.8 g/dL; IgG = 19.7 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 41.1%) compared with calves fed with an esophageal tube feeder (TP = 5.9 g/dL; IgG = 18.7 mg/mL; APT = 100%; AEA = 39.0%).
本研究的目的是调查在投喂大量或少量初乳时,喂养方式(奶瓶与食管饲管)对免疫球蛋白(Ig)G被动转运的影响。新生公牛犊在吮乳前与母牛分离,并随机分配到4个初乳代用品(CR)处理组中的1组:使用奶瓶投喂1.5升(含100克IgG)的CR(第1组;n = 24);使用食管饲管投喂1.5升(含100克IgG)的CR(第2组;n = 24);使用奶瓶投喂3.0升(含200克IgG)的CR(第3组;n = 24),或使用食管饲管投喂3.0升(含200克IgG)的CR(第4组;n = 25)。在24小时龄时采集的血样显示,无论喂养方式如何,与投喂少量(1.5升)CR的犊牛相比,投喂大量(3升)CR的犊牛血清IgG水平显著更高。这些差异归因于投喂3升CR(200克IgG)的犊牛摄入的IgG量大于投喂1.5升CR(100克IgG)的犊牛。对于投喂少量(1.5升)初乳的犊牛,与使用食管饲管喂养的犊牛(总蛋白(TP)= 5.0克/分升;IgG = 9.8毫克/毫升;可接受的被动转运率(APT)= 41.7%;IgG的表观吸收效率(AEA)= 40.5%)相比,使用奶瓶喂养的犊牛血清总蛋白(TP,克/分升)、血清IgG(IgG,毫克/毫升)、可接受的被动转运率(APT,%)和IgG的表观吸收效率(AEA,%)显著更高(TP = 5.3克/分升;IgG = 12.5毫克/毫升;APT = 100%;AEA = 51.1%)。然而,对于投喂大量(3升)初乳的犊牛,与使用食管饲管喂养的犊牛(TP = 5.9克/分升;IgG = 18.7毫克/毫升;APT = 100%;AEA = 39.0%)相比,使用奶瓶喂养的犊牛被动转运指标没有差异(TP = 5.8克/分升;IgG = 19.7毫克/毫升;APT = 100%;AEA = 41.1%)。