Suppr超能文献

一种用于多个脑区的磁共振成像评分量表的开发:与体积测量法及基于体素的形态测量学的比较

Development of an MRI rating scale for multiple brain regions: comparison with volumetrics and with voxel-based morphometry.

作者信息

Davies R Rhys, Scahill Victoria L, Graham Andrew, Williams Guy B, Graham Kim S, Hodges John R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, R3 Box 83, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2009 Aug;51(8):491-503. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0521-z. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to devise a rating method for key frontal and temporal brain regions validated against quantitative volumetric methods and applicable to a range of dementia syndromes.

METHODS

Four standardised coronal MR images from 36 subjects encompassing controls and cases with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) were used. After initial pilot studies, 15 regions produced good intra- and inter-rater reliability. We then validated the ratings against manual volumetry and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and compared ratings across the subject groups.

RESULTS

Validation against both manual volumetry (for both frontal and temporal lobes), and against whole brain VBM, showed good correlation with visual ratings for the majority of the brain regions. Comparison of rating scores across disease groups showed involvement of the anterior fusiform gyrus, anterior hippocampus and temporal pole in semantic dementia, while anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal regions were involved in behavioural variant FTD.

CONCLUSION

This simple visual rating can be used as an alternative to highly technical methods of quantification, and may be superior when dealing with single cases or small groups.

摘要

引言

我们旨在设计一种针对额叶和颞叶关键脑区的评分方法,该方法以定量容积法为对照进行验证,并适用于一系列痴呆综合征。

方法

使用了来自36名受试者的四张标准化冠状位磁共振图像,这些受试者包括对照组以及患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的病例。经过初步的预试验研究,15个脑区产生了良好的评分者内和评分者间信度。然后,我们将这些评分与手动容积测量法和基于体素的形态测量法(VBM)进行验证,并比较各受试者组之间的评分。

结果

与手动容积测量法(针对额叶和颞叶)以及全脑VBM验证相比,大多数脑区的视觉评分显示出良好的相关性。疾病组之间评分的比较显示,语义性痴呆累及前梭状回、前海马体和颞极,而行为变异型FTD累及前扣带回和眶额区域。

结论

这种简单的视觉评分可作为高度技术性定量方法的替代方法,在处理单个病例或小群体时可能更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验