• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于识别急诊科死亡高风险患者的临床预测模型。

A clinical prediction model to identify patients at high risk of death in the emergency department.

作者信息

Coslovsky Michael, Takala Jukka, Exadaktylos Aristomenis K, Martinolli Luca, Merz Tobias M

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3737-x. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-015-3737-x
PMID:25792208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4477719/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rapid assessment and intervention is important for the prognosis of acutely ill patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to prospectively develop and validate a model predicting the risk of in-hospital death based on all available information available at the time of ED admission and to compare its discriminative performance with a non-systematic risk estimate by the triaging first health-care provider.

METHODS

Prospective cohort analysis based on a multivariable logistic regression for the probability of death.

RESULTS

A total of 8,607 consecutive admissions of 7,680 patients admitted to the ED of a tertiary care hospital were analysed. Most frequent APACHE II diagnostic categories at the time of admission were neurological (2,052, 24%), trauma (1,522, 18%), infection categories [1,328, 15%; including sepsis (357, 4.1%), severe sepsis (249, 2.9%), septic shock (27, 0.3%)], cardiovascular (1,022, 12%), gastrointestinal (848, 10%) and respiratory (449, 5%). The predictors of the final model were age, prolonged capillary refill time, blood pressure, mechanical ventilation, oxygen saturation index, Glasgow coma score and APACHE II diagnostic category. The model showed good discriminative ability, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 and good internal validity. The model performed significantly better than non-systematic triaging of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the prediction model can facilitate the identification of ED patients with higher mortality risk. The model performs better than a non-systematic assessment and may facilitate more rapid identification and commencement of treatment of patients at risk of an unfavourable outcome.

摘要

目的

快速评估和干预对于急诊科(ED)收治的急性病患者的预后至关重要。本研究的目的是基于急诊入院时所有可用信息,前瞻性地开发并验证一个预测院内死亡风险的模型,并将其判别性能与首位医疗服务提供者的非系统性风险评估进行比较。

方法

基于多变量逻辑回归分析死亡概率的前瞻性队列研究。

结果

对一家三级医院急诊科收治的7680例患者的8607次连续入院病例进行了分析。入院时最常见的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)诊断类别为神经系统疾病(2052例,24%)、创伤(1522例,18%)、感染类别[1328例,15%;包括脓毒症(357例,4.1%)、严重脓毒症(249例,2.9%)、感染性休克(27例,0.3%)]、心血管疾病(1022例,12%)、胃肠道疾病(848例,10%)和呼吸系统疾病(449例,5%)。最终模型的预测因素为年龄、毛细血管再充盈时间延长、血压、机械通气、氧饱和度指数、格拉斯哥昏迷评分和APACHE II诊断类别。该模型具有良好的判别能力,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.92,且具有良好良好良好。该模型的表现明显优于对患者的非系统性分诊。

结论

使用该预测模型有助于识别死亡风险较高的急诊科患者。该模型的表现优于非系统性评估,可能有助于更快地识别和开始治疗有不良预后风险的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/e6d32f7e4f6c/134_2015_3737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/8cc47443844d/134_2015_3737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/0f9af04c5870/134_2015_3737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/e6d32f7e4f6c/134_2015_3737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/8cc47443844d/134_2015_3737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/0f9af04c5870/134_2015_3737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/4477719/e6d32f7e4f6c/134_2015_3737_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A clinical prediction model to identify patients at high risk of death in the emergency department.一种用于识别急诊科死亡高风险患者的临床预测模型。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3737-x. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
2
Abnormal vital signs are strong predictors for intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality in adults triaged in the emergency department - a prospective cohort study.异常生命体征是预测急诊分诊成年人入住重症监护病房和院内死亡的强指标——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 10;20:28. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-28.
3
The modified south African triage scale system for mortality prediction in resource-constrained emergency surgical centers: a retrospective cohort study.资源受限的急诊外科中心用于死亡率预测的改良南非分诊量表系统:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2541-4.
4
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
5
The role of soluble thrombomodulin in the risk stratification and prognosis evaluation of septic patients in the emergency department.可溶性血栓调节蛋白在急诊科脓毒症患者危险分层和预后评估中的作用。
Thromb Res. 2013 Oct;132(4):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
6
Comparison of Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis in patients meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle.比较符合早期目标导向治疗和严重脓毒症复苏包标准的急诊脓毒症患者的易感性、损伤/感染、反应和器官功能障碍、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 以及死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
7
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia.用于预测急诊科处置情况的悉尼分诊至入院风险工具(START):一项使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州全州范围回顾性数据的推导与内部验证研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4.
8
THERM: the Resuscitation Management score. A prognostic tool to identify critically ill patients in the emergency department.THERM:复苏管理评分。一种用于识别急诊科危重症患者的预后评估工具。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Oct;31(10):803-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202772. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
9
Predicting Early Rapid Response Team Activation in Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department: The PeRRT Score.预测急诊科收治患者早期快速反应团队的启动:PeRRT评分
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;24(2):216-225. doi: 10.1111/acem.13077. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Prognosis of Critically ill patients in the ED and value of perfusion index measurement: a cross-sectional study.急诊科危重症患者的预后及灌注指数测量的价值:一项横断面研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1042-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.033. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving prediction accuracy of hospital arrival vital signs using a multi-output machine learning model: a retrospective study of JSAS-registry data.使用多输出机器学习模型提高医院到达时生命体征的预测准确性:对JSAS登记数据的回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01233-9.
2
The Scoring Model to Predict ICU Stay and Mortality After Emergency Admissions in Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study of 30 366 Patients.预测房颤急诊入院后重症监护病房住院时间和死亡率的评分模型:一项对30366例患者的回顾性研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Feb;48(2):e70101. doi: 10.1002/clc.70101.
3
Deep learning-based Emergency Department In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Score (Deep EDICAS) for early prediction of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.

本文引用的文献

1
How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine.如何推导和验证用于重症监护医学的临床预测模型。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):513-27. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3227-6. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
Derivation and validation of a risk adjustment model for predicting seven day mortality in emergency medical admissions: mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study.一个用于预测急诊入院 7 天死亡率的风险调整模型的推导和验证:混合前瞻性和回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 May 1;344:e2904. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2904.
3
Be careful with triage in emergency departments: interobserver agreement on 1,578 patients in France.
基于深度学习的急诊科院内心脏骤停评分(Deep EDICAS)用于急诊科心脏骤停和心肺复苏的早期预测。
BioData Min. 2024 Nov 23;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13040-024-00407-8.
4
Drinking from the Holy Grail-Does a Perfect Triage System Exist? And Where to Look for It?追寻圣杯——完美的分诊系统存在吗?又该到何处寻觅?
J Pers Med. 2024 May 31;14(6):590. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060590.
5
Prognostic value of capillary refill time in adult patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.毛细血管再充盈时间对成人患者预后的预测价值:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 2;27(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04751-9.
6
Improved patient mortality predictions in emergency departments with deep learning data-synthesis and ensemble models.深度学习数据合成和集成模型可提高急诊科患者死亡率预测精度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 12;13(1):15031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41544-0.
7
Comparing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction by Senior Emergency Resident's Judgment and Prognostic Models in the Emergency Department.比较急诊科资深住院医师判断和预后模型对住院患者死亡率的预测。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 May 15;2023:6042762. doi: 10.1155/2023/6042762. eCollection 2023.
8
A Prospective Observational Study Conducted at a Single Center in Japan to Validate a Previously Developed Predictive Formula of In-Hospital Mortality for Patients Aged ≥65 Years with Endogenous Diseases Transported by Ambulance.在日本的一个单中心进行的前瞻性观察研究,旨在验证先前开发的针对≥65 岁因内源性疾病而由救护车转运的患者的住院死亡率预测公式。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Nov 16;28:e938385. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938385.
9
Practice of oxygen use in anesthesiology - a survey of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.麻醉学中的氧气使用实践——欧洲麻醉学和重症监护学会的调查。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01884-2.
10
Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: the PLANS (platelet lymphocyte age neutrophil sex) model.中国武汉 COVID-19 住院患者院内死亡的预测预后模型的建立和验证:PLANS(血小板淋巴细胞年龄中性粒细胞性别)模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;20(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05688-y.
在急诊科分诊时要小心:法国 1578 名患者的观察者间一致性。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 31;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-19.
4
Predictive scoring in non-trauma emergency patients: a scoping review.非创伤性急诊患者的预测评分:范围综述。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Oct;28(10):827-37. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.099291. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
5
Prediction of critical illness during out-of-hospital emergency care.院外急救中危重症的预测。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):747-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1140.
6
ViEWS--Towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration.ViEWS--开发一种用于检测成人住院患者病情恶化的全国性早期预警评分。
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.014.
7
Risk scoring systems for adults admitted to the emergency department: a systematic review.成人急诊入院风险评分系统:系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Feb 11;18:8. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-8.
8
Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.评估预测模型的性能:传统和新型指标的框架。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2.
9
Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study.使用急诊严重程度指数和曼彻斯特分诊系统预测入院情况和死亡率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jul;26(7):506-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.063768.
10
Does nonmedical hospital admission staff accurately triage emergency department patients?非医疗医院入院工作人员能否准确分诊急诊科患者?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;16(4):172-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32830c2193.