Piancino Maria Grazia, Farina Dario, Talpone Francesca, Merlo Andrea, Bracco Pietro
Department of Orthodontics and Gnathology, Dental School, Turin University, V. Nizza 230, Turin, Italy.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Apr;117(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00601.x.
The aim of this study was to characterize the kinematics and masseter muscle activation in unilateral posterior crossbite. Eighty-two children (8.6 +/- 1.3 yr of age) with unilateral posterior crossbite and 12 children (8.9 +/- 0.6 yr of age) with normal occlusion were selected for the study. Electromyography (EMG) and kinematics were concurrently recorded during mastication of a soft bolus and a hard bolus. The percentage of reverse cycles in the group of patients was 59.0 +/- 33.1% (soft bolus) and 69.7 +/- 29.7% (hard bolus) when chewing on the crossbite side. When chewing on the non-affected side, the number of reverse cycles was 16.7 +/- 24.5% (soft bolus) and 16.7 +/- 22.3% (hard bolus). The reverse cycles on the crossbite side were narrower with respect to the cycles on the non-affected side. Although both types of cycles in patients resulted in lower EMG activity of the masseter of the crossbite side than of the contralateral masseter, the activity of the non-affected side was larger for reverse than for non-reverse cycles. It was concluded that when chewing on the crossbite side, the masseter activity is reduced on the mastication side (crossbite) and is unaltered (non-reverse cycles) or increased (reverse) on the non-affected side.
本研究的目的是描述单侧后牙反合的运动学特征及咬肌激活情况。选取82例单侧后牙反合儿童(年龄8.6±1.3岁)和12例正常咬合儿童(年龄8.9±0.6岁)进行研究。在咀嚼软食团和硬食团过程中同步记录肌电图(EMG)和运动学数据。患者组在反合侧咀嚼时,反向循环的百分比在软食团时为59.0±33.1%,硬食团时为69.7±29.7%。在非患侧咀嚼时,反向循环的数量在软食团时为16.7±24.5%,硬食团时为16.7±22.3%。与非患侧的循环相比,反合侧的反向循环更窄。尽管患者的两种类型循环均导致反合侧咬肌的肌电图活动低于对侧咬肌,但非患侧反向循环的活动比对非反向循环的活动更大。得出的结论是,在反合侧咀嚼时,咀嚼侧(反合侧)咬肌活动降低,非患侧咬肌活动不变(非反向循环)或增加(反向循环)。