• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电话的护理干预可提高癌症临床试验中知情同意过程的有效性。

Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Aaronson N K, Visser-Pol E, Leenhouts G H, Muller M J, van der Schot A C, van Dam F S, Keus R B, Koning C C, ten Bokkel Huinink W W, van Dongen J A, Dubbelman R

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):984-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.984.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.984
PMID:8622050
Abstract

PURPOSE

Here we report the results of a randomized study undertaken to test the efficacy of a supplementary, telephone-based nursing intervention in increasing patients' awareness and understanding of the clinical trials in which they are asked to participate.

METHODS

During a 12-month period, 180 cancer patients who were approached to participate in a phase II or III clinical trial were randomized to undergo either of the following: (1) standard informed consent procedures based on verbal explanations from the treating physician plus written information (controls); or (2) standard informed consent procedures plus a supplementary, telephone-based contact with an oncology nurse (intervention). For purposes of evaluation, face-to-face interviews were conducted with all patients approximately 1 week after the informed consent process had been completed.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with regard to sociodemographic and clinical variables. Both groups had a high level of awareness of the diagnosis and of the nature and objectives of the proposed treatments. The intervention group was significantly (P < .01) better informed about the following: (1) the risks and side effects of treatment; (2) the clinical trial context of the treatment; (3) the objectives of the clinical trial; (4) where relevant, the use of randomization in allocating treatment; (5) the availability of alternative treatments; (6) the voluntary nature of participation; and (7) the right to withdraw from the clinical trial. The intervention did not have any significant effect on patients' anxiety levels or on rates of clinical trial participation. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The use of a supplementary, telephone-based nursing intervention is a feasible and effective means to increase cancer patients' awareness and understanding of the salient issues that surround the clinical trials in which they are asked to participate.

摘要

目的

我们在此报告一项随机研究的结果,该研究旨在测试一种基于电话的补充护理干预措施在提高患者对要求其参与的临床试验的认识和理解方面的效果。

方法

在12个月期间,180名被邀请参与II期或III期临床试验的癌症患者被随机分为以下两组:(1)基于主治医生的口头解释加书面信息的标准知情同意程序(对照组);或(2)标准知情同意程序加与肿瘤护士进行的基于电话的补充联系(干预组)。为进行评估,在知情同意程序完成后约1周对所有患者进行了面对面访谈。

结果

两组在社会人口统计学和临床变量方面具有可比性。两组对诊断以及拟进行治疗的性质和目标都有较高的认知水平。干预组在以下方面的了解明显更好(P <.01):(1)治疗的风险和副作用;(2)治疗的临床试验背景;(3)临床试验的目标;(4)在相关情况下,治疗分配中随机化的使用;(5)替代治疗的可用性;(6)参与的自愿性质;以及(7)退出临床试验的权利。该干预对患者的焦虑水平或临床试验参与率没有任何显著影响。患者对该干预的满意度很高。

结论

使用基于电话的补充护理干预是一种可行且有效的方法,可提高癌症患者对其被要求参与的临床试验所涉及的重要问题的认识和理解。

相似文献

1
Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.基于电话的护理干预可提高癌症临床试验中知情同意过程的有效性。
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):984-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.984.
2
Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.面向专业人员的质量保证调查问卷未能提高知情同意的质量。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):638-49. doi: 10.1177/1740774507085144.
3
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.I期癌症试验中特定队列同意和患者控制的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2305-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2305.
4
Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.一项关于参与临床试验的易读知情同意书的随机对照试验:东部肿瘤协作组的研究
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):836-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.022.
5
Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone - a randomized controlled trial.通过电话招募参与临床试验——一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Nov 21;17(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1680-y.
6
Maximizing Patient Recruitment and Retention in a Secondary Stroke Prevention Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned from the STAND FIRM Study.在二级卒中预防临床试验中最大化患者招募与留存率:从“坚定立场”研究中汲取的经验教训
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jun;25(6):1371-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trials.同意参与临床试验的癌症患者的知识和理解。
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(17):2627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
8
Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training.寻求癌症临床试验的知情同意;评估医生沟通技能培训的效果。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):507-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1095.
9
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.
10
Audio-recorded information to patients considering participation in cancer clinical trials - a randomized study.向考虑参与癌症临床试验的患者提供录音信息——一项随机研究。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Sep;53(9):1197-204. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.921726. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Researchers experience and views on participants' comprehension of informed consent in clinical trials in Malawi: a descriptive qualitative study.研究者在马拉维临床试验中对参与者理解知情同意的体验和看法:一项描述性定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01100-5.
2
SWAT 84: effects of same-day consent vs delayed consent on the recruitment and retention of trial participants-an observational SWAT.SWAT84:同日同意与延迟同意对试验参与者招募和保留的影响——一项观察性 SWAT 研究。
Trials. 2023 Oct 25;24(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07727-w.
3
Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials and Learning Health Systems in Pain Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.
实用比较有效性临床试验和疼痛医学中的学习健康系统:机遇与挑战。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2023 Jun;41(2):503-517. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
4
Development and preliminary evaluation of tablet computer-based decision aid for patients participating in cancer clinical trials.用于参与癌症临床试验患者的基于平板电脑的决策辅助工具的开发与初步评估
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 11;24:100854. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100854. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff.知情同意过程评估:研究参与者和工作人员的观点。
Trials. 2021 Aug 18;22(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1.
6
Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research.随机比较两种干预措施,以增强研究知情同意过程中的理解。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):466-476. doi: 10.1177/17407745211009529. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.促进儿科临床试验中的知情同意/同意/同意
Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Aug;21(4):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00347-5.
8
A Digital Health App to Assess Decisional Capacity to Provide Informed Consent: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一款用于评估知情同意决策能力的数字健康应用程序:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 19;7(11):e10360. doi: 10.2196/10360.
9
Multimedia psychoeducation for patients with cancer who are eligible for clinical trials: A randomized clinical trial.适合参加临床试验的癌症患者的多媒体心理教育:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2018 Dec 1;124(23):4504-4511. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31771. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
10
Patients' knowledge and perceived understanding - Associations with consenting to participate in cancer clinical trials.患者的知识与感知理解——与同意参与癌症临床试验的关联
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2015 Dec 17;2:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.001. eCollection 2016 Apr 15.