• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中的知情同意。

Informed consent in clinical trials.

作者信息

Verheggen F W, van Wijmen F C

机构信息

University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 1996 May;36(2):131-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5.

DOI:10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5
PMID:10158765
Abstract

A review is provided in this paper on the empirical literature on informed consent from 1979 to 1995 referring to information disclosure and trial participation in clinical trials. Articles being reviewed focus upon information disclosure, reactions to disclosure and recall, features of consent and perceptions of informed consent, both in hypothetical and in real life situations. It is concluded that further research is needed to study the process of informed consent in clinical trials, to obtain a better insight into the myth and reality of informed consent in daily practice. Future studies should come forward on the limitations of previous empirical research on informed consent. Additional research should focus on the perspectives of patients who accept or decline trial participation.

摘要

本文对1979年至1995年间关于临床试验中信息披露和试验参与的知情同意实证文献进行了综述。所综述的文章聚焦于信息披露、对披露的反应和回忆、同意的特征以及在假设和现实生活情境中对知情同意的认知。得出的结论是,需要进一步研究临床试验中的知情同意过程,以便更好地洞察日常实践中知情同意的虚构与现实。未来的研究应探讨先前知情同意实证研究的局限性。额外的研究应关注接受或拒绝参与试验的患者的观点。

相似文献

1
Informed consent in clinical trials.临床试验中的知情同意。
Health Policy. 1996 May;36(2):131-53. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5.
2
Myth and reality of informed consent in clinical trials.临床试验中知情同意的神话与现实。
Med Law. 1997;16(1):53-69.
3
Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials.患者对临床试验中知情同意和信息披露质量的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Nov;29(2):137-53. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(96)00859-2.
4
Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.治疗性研究对知情同意及临床试验伦理的影响:肿瘤医学视角
J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1601-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1601.
5
Exception from informed consent for pediatric resuscitation research: community consultation for a trial of brain cooling after in-hospital cardiac arrest.儿科复苏研究知情同意的例外情况:关于院内心脏骤停后脑部降温试验的社区咨询
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):776-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0482.
6
Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials.重症监护临床试验知情同意书的建议。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):867-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000159201.08203.10.
7
Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research.从老年人那里获得有意义的知情同意:实证研究的结构化文献综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Apr;46(4):517-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02477.x.
8
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.I期癌症试验中特定队列同意和患者控制的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2305-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2305.
9
Obtaining voluntary consent for research in desperately ill patients.在重症患者中获取研究的自愿同意书。
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023957.23565.E9.
10
The informed consent process and the use of the exception to informed consent in the clinical trial of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) in severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock. DCLHb Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock study group.双阿司匹林交联血红蛋白(DCLHb)用于严重创伤性失血性休克临床试验中的知情同意过程及知情同意例外情况的使用。DCLHb创伤性失血性休克研究组。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;6(12):1203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00134.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunity Cost or Opportunity Lost: An Empirical Assessment of Ethical Concerns and Attitudes of EEG Neurofeedback Users.机会成本或机会损失:对脑电图神经反馈使用者的伦理关注和态度的实证评估
Neuroethics. 2022 Oct;15(3). doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09506-x. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Patient and Proxy Recall After Providing Written or Oral Informed Consent to Participate in an Interventional Trial.患者和代理人在书面或口头知情同意参与干预性试验后的回忆。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14052.
3
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.
非洲综合人口健康数据库的考量:全球最佳实践的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Ethical Issues in Intraoperative Neuroscience Research: Assessing Subjects' Recall of Informed Consent and Motivations for Participation.术中神经科学研究中的伦理问题:评估受试者对知情同意的回忆和参与动机。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941415. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.物质使用障碍治疗研究中青少年的知情同意回忆
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2016;25(5):417-427. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2015.1056866. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.一项关于电子知情同意流程的随机对照试验。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):1-7. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552627. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
7
Decision Making in the PICU: An Examination of Factors Influencing Participation Decisions in Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials.儿科重症监护病房中的决策制定:对影响III期随机临床试验参与决策的因素的考察。
Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:676023. doi: 10.1155/2014/676023. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques.通过结合补救和激励技巧,在研究同意方面实现新的回忆水平。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):264-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101124. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
9
Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences.本科学生研究参与者会阅读心理学研究同意书吗?考察记忆效应、条件效应和个体差异。
Ethics Behav. 2011;21(4):332-350. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585601. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi.提高低识字人群对临床试验程序的理解:马拉维杀微生物剂试验中的一项干预措施。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Nov 8;13:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-29.