Leppäniemi A K, Kivisaari A O, Haapiainen R K, Lehtonen T A
Second Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Br J Urol. 1991 Oct;68(4):355-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15349.x.
The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of blunt renal parenchymal trauma was compared with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in a prospective study of 12 patients. CT was superior to other methods in identifying and characterising the renal parenchymal lesion, and both CT and US exceeded low field MRI in recognising a perirenal fluid collection. The role of high field MRI in the evaluation of blunt renal trauma requires further study.