Suppr超能文献

一项关于非甾体抗炎药作为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克危险因素的多中心病例对照研究。

A multicentre case-control study of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a risk factor for severe sepsis and septic shock.

作者信息

Legras Annick, Giraudeau Bruno, Jonville-Bera Annie-Pierre, Camus Christophe, François Bruno, Runge Isabelle, Kouatchet Achille, Veinstein Anne, Tayoro Jérome, Villers Daniel, Autret-Leca Elisabeth

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Tours, Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R43. doi: 10.1186/cc7766. Epub 2009 Mar 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to establish whether the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during evolving bacterial community-acquired infection in adults is associated with severe sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre case-control study in eight intensive care units. Cases were all adult patients admitted for severe sepsis or septic shock due to a bacterial community-acquired infection. Control individuals were patients hospitalized with a mild community-acquired infection. Each case was matched to one control for age, presence of diabetes and site of infection.

RESULTS

The main outcome measures were the proportions of cases and controls exposed to NSAIDs or aspirin during the period of observation. In all, 152 matched pairs were analyzed. The use of NSAIDs or aspirin during the observation period did not differ between cases and controls (27% versus 28; odds ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52 to 1.64). If aspirin was not considered or if a distinction was made between acute and chronic drug treatment, there remained no difference between groups. However, the median time to prescription of effective antibiotic therapy was longer for NSAID users (6 days, 95% CI = 3 to 7 days) than for nonusers (3 days, 95% CI = 2 to 3 days; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the use of NSAIDs or aspirin during evolving bacterial infection was frequent and occurred in one-quarter of the patients with such infection. Although the use of NSAIDs by patients with severe sepsis or septic shock did not differ from their use by those with mild infection at the same infected site, we observed a longer median time to prescription of effective antibiotic therapy in NSAID users.

摘要

引言

我们旨在确定成人在细菌社区获得性感染进展期间使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是否与严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克相关。

方法

我们在八个重症监护病房进行了一项多中心病例对照研究。病例均为因细菌社区获得性感染而入院治疗严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的成年患者。对照个体为患有轻度社区获得性感染的住院患者。每个病例按年龄、是否患有糖尿病和感染部位与一名对照进行匹配。

结果

主要观察指标为在观察期内暴露于NSAIDs或阿司匹林的病例和对照的比例。总共分析了152对匹配病例。观察期内NSAIDs或阿司匹林的使用在病例和对照之间没有差异(27%对28%;优势比=0.93,95%置信区间[CI]=0.52至1.64)。如果不考虑阿司匹林,或者区分急性和慢性药物治疗,各组之间仍然没有差异。然而,NSAIDs使用者开始使用有效抗生素治疗的中位时间(6天,95%CI=3至7天)比未使用者(3天,95%CI=2至3天;P=0.02)更长。

结论

在本研究中,在细菌感染进展期间使用NSAIDs或阿司匹林的情况很常见,在四分之一的此类感染患者中出现。虽然严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者使用NSAIDs的情况与相同感染部位轻度感染患者的使用情况没有差异,但我们观察到NSAIDs使用者开始使用有效抗生素治疗的中位时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e08/2689487/dfb1a243571a/cc7766-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验