Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查质量评估。

Colonoscopy quality assessment.

作者信息

Morán Sánchez S, Torrella E, Esteban Delgado P, Baños Madrid R, García A, Ono A, Pérez Cuadrado E, Parra P, Cruzado Quevedo J, Pérez Riquelme F, Carballo Alvarez F

机构信息

Department of Digestive Diseases, University Hospital Satna María del Rosell, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Feb;101(2):107-12, 112-6. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082009000200004.

Abstract

AIM

Colonoscopy has become accepted as the most effective method for colon exploration. Some application problems have been detected in the setting of normal clinical care due to its wide range of uses in recent years, and therefore there is a need to measure colonoscopy quality. For that purpose valid quality indicators are necessary to be defined. The application process of some quality indicators is presented in this study. The proposed indicators in this study are: quality of bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate, and adenoma removal rate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a prospective 12-month study where colonoscopies performed in the VI health area of Murcia Region were evaluated. From February 2006 to February 2007 a total of 609 subjects were eligible for colonoscopy after a positive fecal blood test in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program. A sample of thirty patients (n: 30) was considered representative to assess the reliability of quality indicators and for a preliminary analysis of results.

RESULTS

Indicators results are: quality of bowel preparation (87%), kappa 0.74 (95% CI: 0.48-0.99); cecal intubation rate (90%) 0.74 (95% CI: 0.49-0.99); adenoma detection and removal rate (96%), kappa: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.53-0.99); withdrawal time: 13.36 min (95% CI: 10.48-16.11). Kappa: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.49-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality indicators definition and application in colonoscopy performance is possible. More studies are necessary to define the role of these indicators in the setting of clinical practice.

摘要

目的

结肠镜检查已被公认为是结肠探查最有效的方法。近年来,由于其应用范围广泛,在正常临床护理中发现了一些应用问题,因此需要对结肠镜检查质量进行评估。为此,必须定义有效的质量指标。本研究介绍了一些质量指标的应用过程。本研究中提出的指标包括:肠道准备质量、盲肠插管率、退镜时间、腺瘤检出率和腺瘤切除率。

材料与方法

这是一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究,对穆尔西亚地区第六卫生区进行的结肠镜检查进行评估。在2006年2月至2007年2月期间,在一项结直肠癌筛查计划中,共有609名粪便潜血试验呈阳性的受试者符合结肠镜检查条件。选取30例患者(n = 30)作为样本,以评估质量指标的可靠性并对结果进行初步分析。

结果

指标结果如下:肠道准备质量(87%),kappa值为0.74(95%置信区间:0.48 - 0.99);盲肠插管率(90%),kappa值为0.74(95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.99);腺瘤检出和切除率(96%),kappa值为0.78(95%置信区间:0.53 - 0.99);退镜时间:13.36分钟(95%置信区间:10.48 - 16.11)。kappa值为0.78(95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.99)。

结论

在结肠镜检查操作中定义和应用质量指标是可行的。需要更多的研究来确定这些指标在临床实践中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验