Keeling Patrick J
Department of Botany, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00371.x.
The establishment of a new plastid organelle by secondary endosymbiosis represents a series of events of massive complexity, and yet we know it has taken place multiple times because both green and red algae have been taken up by other eukaryotic lineages. Exactly how many times these events have succeeded, however, has been a matter of debate that significantly impacts how we view plastid evolution, protein targeting, and eukaryotic relationships. On the green side it is now largely accepted that two independent events led to plastids of euglenids and chlorarachniophytes. How many times red algae have been taken up is less clear, because there are many more lineages with red alga-derived plastids (cryptomonads, haptophytes, heterokonts, dinoflagellates and apicomplexa) and the relationships between these lineages are less clear. Ten years ago, Cavalier-Smith proposed that these plastids were all derived from a single endosymbiosis, an idea that was dubbed the chromalveolate hypothesis. No one observation has yet supported the chromalveolate hypothesis as a whole, but molecular data from plastid-encoded and plastid-targeted proteins have provided strong support for several components of the overall hypothesis, and evidence for cryptic plastids and new photosynthetic lineages (e.g. Chromera) have transformed our view of plastid distribution within the group. Collectively, these data are most easily reconciled with a single origin of the chromalveolate plastids, although the phylogeny of chromalveolate host lineages (and potentially Rhizaria) remain to be reconciled with this plastid data.
通过二次内共生建立新的质体细胞器代表了一系列极其复杂的事件,然而我们知道这种情况已经发生了多次,因为绿藻和红藻都曾被其他真核生物谱系所摄取。然而,这些事件究竟成功发生了多少次一直是一个有争议的问题,这对我们如何看待质体进化、蛋白质靶向以及真核生物之间的关系有着重大影响。在绿藻方面,目前人们普遍认为有两次独立的事件导致了眼虫类和绿藻虫类的质体形成。红藻被摄取的次数则不太明确,因为有更多的谱系含有源自红藻的质体(隐藻、定鞭藻、不等鞭毛类、甲藻和顶复门),而且这些谱系之间的关系不太清晰。十年前,卡瓦利埃-史密斯提出这些质体都源自单一的内共生事件,这一观点被称为色素体藻类假说。目前还没有一项观察结果能全面支持色素体藻类假说,但来自质体编码和质体靶向蛋白质的分子数据为该总体假说的几个组成部分提供了有力支持,而且关于隐性质体和新光合谱系(如Chromera)的证据改变了我们对该类群内质体分布的看法。总体而言,这些数据最容易与色素体藻类质体的单一起源相协调,尽管色素体藻类宿主谱系(可能还有根足虫类)的系统发育仍有待与这些质体数据相协调。