Fillmore Mark T, Milich Richard, Lorch Elizabeth P
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Spring;21(2):539-54. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000297.
Application of theoretically based tasks to the study of the development of selective attention has led to intriguing new findings concerning the role of inhibitory mechanisms. This study examined inhibitory mechanisms using a countermanding task and an inhibition of return task to compare deficits in intentionally, versus reflexively, controlled inhibition of attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Fifty children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were classified into one of three subtypes: predominantly inattentive (ADHD/PI), combined (ADHD/C), and those children with ADHD/C who also met criteria for comorbid oppositional defiant disorder (ADHD/C + ODD). The groups were compared to a comparison group of children (n = 21). The countermanding task showed that the ADHD groups required more time to inhibit responses and this impairment did not differ among subtypes. With respect to reflexively controlled inhibition, compared with controls ADHD/C and ADHD/C + ODD groups showed impaired reflexive inhibition, whereas the ADHD/PI group was considerably less impaired. The findings highlight a dissociation between the two forms of inhibitory deficits among children with the inattentive subtype, and raise the possibility that the efficient operation of reflexive inhibitory mechanisms might be necessary for the development of effective intentional control of inhibition.
将基于理论的任务应用于选择性注意发展的研究,已得出有关抑制机制作用的有趣新发现。本研究使用停止任务和返回抑制任务来检验抑制机制,以比较注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童在有意控制与反射性控制注意力抑制方面的缺陷。五十名注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童被分为三种亚型之一:主要为注意力不集中型(ADHD/PI)、混合型(ADHD/C),以及那些同时符合对立违抗障碍共病标准的ADHD/C儿童(ADHD/C + ODD)。将这些组与一组儿童对照组(n = 21)进行比较。停止任务表明,ADHD组抑制反应需要更多时间,且这种损害在各亚型之间并无差异。关于反射性控制抑制,与对照组相比,ADHD/C组和ADHD/C + ODD组表现出反射性抑制受损,而ADHD/PI组受损程度则小得多。这些发现凸显了注意力不集中亚型儿童两种抑制缺陷形式之间的分离,并提出了反射性抑制机制的有效运作可能是有效有意控制抑制发展所必需的可能性。