Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):223-33. doi: 10.1037/a0021408.
Researchers in the cognitive sciences recognize a fundamental distinction between automatic and intentional mechanisms of inhibitory control. The use of eye-tracking tasks to assess selective attention has led to a better understanding of this distinction in specific populations, such as children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study examined automatic and intentional inhibitory control mechanisms in adults with ADHD using a saccadic interference task and a delayed ocular response task. Thirty adults with ADHD were evaluated against 27 comparison adults on measures of inhibitory control. The delayed ocular response task showed that adults with ADHD were less able than comparison adults to inhibit a reflexive saccade toward the sudden appearance of a stimulus in the periphery. However, saccadic interference task performance showed that the ADHD group did not differ significantly from the comparison group on a measure of automatic inhibitory control. These findings suggest a dissociation between automatic and intentional inhibitory deficits in adults with ADHD.
认知科学研究人员认识到抑制控制的自动和有意机制之间的根本区别。使用眼动追踪任务来评估选择性注意力,使得对特定人群(例如患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童)的这种区别有了更好的理解。本研究使用眼跳干扰任务和延迟眼动反应任务,检查了 ADHD 成年人的自动和有意抑制控制机制。在抑制控制措施方面,对 30 名 ADHD 成年人和 27 名对照组成年人进行了评估。延迟眼动反应任务表明,与对照组成年人相比,ADHD 成年人不太能够抑制对突然出现在外围的刺激的反射性眼跳。但是,眼跳干扰任务的表现表明,ADHD 组在自动抑制控制的测量上与对照组没有显著差异。这些发现表明,ADHD 成年人的自动和有意抑制缺陷存在分离。