Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 202A Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Oct;38(7):971-83. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9420-3.
This study compared inhibitory functioning among ADHD subtype groups on manual and visual versions of the stop task. Seventy-six children, identified as ADHD/I (n=17), ADHD/C (n=43), and comparison (n=20) completed both tasks. Results indicated that both ADHD groups were slower to inhibit responses than the comparison group on both tasks. Comparison children were faster to inhibit than activate responses on both tasks. Children in the ADHD groups also demonstrated this robust pattern on the manual task. However, on the visual task, the ADHD groups evidenced slowed inhibition comparable to the time required to activate responding. This implies that the visual task is more sensitive than the manual task to inhibitory deficits associated with ADHD. The ADHD/I and the ADHD/C groups did not differ on most measures, suggesting that neither stop task is effective in differentiating the subtypes. These findings extend work highlighting the role of disinhibition in ADHD, and contrast recent work suggesting divergence between ADHD subtypes.
本研究比较了 ADHD 亚型在手动和视觉停止任务中的抑制功能。76 名儿童,包括 ADHD/I(n=17)、ADHD/C(n=43)和对照组(n=20),均完成了这两个任务。结果表明,与对照组相比,ADHD 两组在两个任务上的反应抑制都较慢。对照组在两个任务上的抑制反应都快于激活反应。ADHD 组的儿童在手任务上也表现出这种明显的模式。然而,在视觉任务中,ADHD 组的抑制时间与激活反应所需的时间相当。这意味着与 ADHD 相关的抑制缺陷在视觉任务中比手动任务更敏感。ADHD/I 组和 ADHD/C 组在大多数指标上没有差异,这表明这两个停止任务都不能有效地区分亚型。这些发现扩展了强调抑制在 ADHD 中的作用的工作,并与最近表明 ADHD 亚型之间存在差异的工作形成对比。