• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Influence of ownership on access in outpatient substance abuse treatment.所有权对门诊药物滥用治疗可及性的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jun;36(4):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.009. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
2
Managed care and access to substance abuse treatment services.管理式医疗与药物滥用治疗服务的可及性
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;30(2):161-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02289805.
3
Ownership and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment centers.门诊药物滥用治疗中心的所有权与运营情况
Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):711-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.5.711.
4
Ownership differences in the provision of outpatient substance abuse services.门诊药物滥用服务提供方面的所有权差异。
Adm Soc Work. 1994;18(3):59-91. doi: 10.1300/J147v18n03_03.
5
Two separate tracks? A national multivariate analysis of differences between public and private substance abuse treatment programs.两条不同的轨迹?对公立和私立药物滥用治疗项目差异的全国性多变量分析。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 Aug;26(3):429-42. doi: 10.1081/ada-100100254.
6
Private and public ownership in outpatient substance abuse treatment: do we have a two-tiered system?
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2000 Mar;27(4):197-209. doi: 10.1023/a:1021357318246.
7
Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access.公共部门的表现是否优于非营利部门和营利部门?来自一项关于养老院质量和可及性的全国性面板研究的证据。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2008 Spring;27(2):326-53. doi: 10.1002/pam.20327.
8
Organizational and client determinants of cost in outpatient substance abuse treatment.门诊药物滥用治疗中成本的组织和客户决定因素。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):3-13.
9
Changes in managed care activity in outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations, 1995-2000.1995 - 2000年门诊药物滥用治疗机构中管理式医疗活动的变化
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;30(4):369-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02287425.
10
The Impact of Medicaid Institutions for Mental Disease Exclusion Waivers on the Availability of Substance Abuse Treatment Services and the Varying Effect by Ownership Type.医疗补助精神疾病排除豁免对物质滥用治疗服务的可及性的影响以及所有权类型的不同影响。
Milbank Q. 2024 Sep;102(3):669-691. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12710. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential impact of hospital and community factors on breadth and depth of hospital population health partnerships.医院和社区因素对医院人群健康伙伴关系广度和深度的差异影响。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14238. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14238. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Understanding the role of financial capacity in the delivery of opioid use disorder treatment.理解财务能力在阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 16;23(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09179-z.
3
What Explains Changes in Availability of Specialty Mental Health Services in Organized Settings?是什么解释了组织环境中精神科专科医院服务可及性的变化?
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1166-1191. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12592. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
A latent class analysis of tailored substance use treatment programs: Implications for treating syndemic conditions facing sexual and gender minority populations.基于定制化物质使用治疗项目的潜在类别分析:对治疗性与性别少数群体面临的综合征条件的启示。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Sep 1;238:109550. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109550. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
Medicaid coverage in substance use disorder treatment after the affordable care act.平价医疗法案实施后,物质使用障碍治疗中的医疗补助覆盖范围。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jul;102:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Failure to get into substance abuse treatment.未能接受药物滥用治疗。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb;73:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Substance abuse and batterer programmes in California, USA: factors associated with treatment outcomes.美国加利福尼亚州的药物滥用与施暴者项目:与治疗结果相关的因素
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Nov;23(6):642-53. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12178. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
A call for evidence-based medical treatment of opioid dependence in the United States and Canada.呼吁在美国和加拿大进行基于证据的阿片类药物依赖治疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1462-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0846.
9
Understanding the drug treatment community's ambivalence towards tobacco use and treatment.了解药物治疗社区对烟草使用和治疗的矛盾态度。
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 May;23(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.11.006. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
10
Factors related to Medicaid payment acceptance at outpatient substance abuse treatment programs.与门诊药物滥用治疗计划接受医疗补助支付相关的因素。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):632-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01206.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Is managed care closing substance abuse treatment units?管理式医疗是否正在关闭药物滥用治疗机构?
Manag Care Interface. 2007 Mar;20(3):28-32.
2
Impact of program services on treatment outcomes of patients with comorbid mental and substance use disorders.项目服务对合并精神障碍和物质使用障碍患者治疗结果的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jul;57(7):1007-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.7.1007.
3
Does the impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment services vary by provider profit status?管理式医疗对药物滥用治疗服务的影响是否因提供者的盈利状况而异?
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1862-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00431.x.
4
Use of mental health care and substance abuse treatment among adults with co-occurring disorders.患有共病的成年人对心理健康护理和药物滥用治疗的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Aug;56(8):954-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.8.954.
5
Factors that influence staffing of outpatient substance abuse treatment programs.影响门诊药物滥用治疗项目人员配备的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Aug;56(8):934-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.8.934.
6
Welfare reform and substance abuse.福利改革与药物滥用。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(1):65-99. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2005.00336.x.
7
Use of substance abuse treatment services by persons with mental health and substance use problems.患有精神健康和物质使用问题的人对物质滥用治疗服务的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Mar;54(3):363-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.3.363.
8
Changes in methadone treatment practices: results from a national panel study, 1988-2000.美沙酮治疗实践的变化:1988 - 2000年全国性专题研究结果
JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):850-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.7.850.
9
Access to services in the substance abuse treatment system. Variations by facility characteristics.
Recent Dev Alcohol. 2001;15:137-56. doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-47193-3_8.
10
Rethinking access to alcohol treatment.重新思考获得酒精治疗的途径。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 2001;15:107-36. doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-47193-3_7.

所有权对门诊药物滥用治疗可及性的影响。

Influence of ownership on access in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

作者信息

Nahra Tammie A, Alexander Jeffrey, Pollack Harold

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Michigan, 109 S Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jun;36(4):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.009. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.009
PMID:19339142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2760741/
Abstract

Marked changes in ownership and control in substance abuse treatment delivery have garnered the attention of providers and policymakers alike. The proliferation of private for-profit providers and the shift to a delivery system that may be more explicitly influenced by financial incentives are of particular concern for this vulnerable population. This work empirically addresses how treatment unit ownership affected access and retention between 1995 and 2005 in the United States. Regressions show statistically significant associations between unit ownership and both restricted treatment access and shortening of treatment duration for financial reasons. In comparison to private nonprofit and public units, private for-profit units were less likely to provide initial treatment access and reported shortened treatment for a greater percentage of clients unable to pay. Other organization characteristics, such as methadone-maintenance programs and managed care participation, also were associated with limiting treatment accessibility. While this work does not determine the underlying motivation behind access limitations, continued shifts in ownership structure should heighten the attention of policymakers.

摘要

物质滥用治疗服务提供方面所有权和控制权的显著变化引起了提供者和政策制定者的关注。私人营利性提供者的激增以及向可能更受经济激励明确影响的服务提供系统的转变,尤其令这一弱势群体担忧。这项研究实证探讨了1995年至2005年期间美国治疗机构所有权如何影响治疗的可及性和留存率。回归分析表明,机构所有权与因经济原因导致的受限治疗可及性和治疗时长缩短之间存在统计学上的显著关联。与私人非营利性机构和公共机构相比,私人营利性机构提供初始治疗的可能性较小,并且报告称,在无力支付费用的客户中,有更大比例的人治疗时长缩短。其他机构特征,如美沙酮维持治疗项目和参与管理式医疗,也与限制治疗可及性有关。虽然这项研究并未确定可及性限制背后的潜在动机,但所有权结构的持续变化应引起政策制定者的更多关注。