Nahra Tammie A, Alexander Jeffrey, Pollack Harold
Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Michigan, 109 S Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jun;36(4):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.009. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
Marked changes in ownership and control in substance abuse treatment delivery have garnered the attention of providers and policymakers alike. The proliferation of private for-profit providers and the shift to a delivery system that may be more explicitly influenced by financial incentives are of particular concern for this vulnerable population. This work empirically addresses how treatment unit ownership affected access and retention between 1995 and 2005 in the United States. Regressions show statistically significant associations between unit ownership and both restricted treatment access and shortening of treatment duration for financial reasons. In comparison to private nonprofit and public units, private for-profit units were less likely to provide initial treatment access and reported shortened treatment for a greater percentage of clients unable to pay. Other organization characteristics, such as methadone-maintenance programs and managed care participation, also were associated with limiting treatment accessibility. While this work does not determine the underlying motivation behind access limitations, continued shifts in ownership structure should heighten the attention of policymakers.
物质滥用治疗服务提供方面所有权和控制权的显著变化引起了提供者和政策制定者的关注。私人营利性提供者的激增以及向可能更受经济激励明确影响的服务提供系统的转变,尤其令这一弱势群体担忧。这项研究实证探讨了1995年至2005年期间美国治疗机构所有权如何影响治疗的可及性和留存率。回归分析表明,机构所有权与因经济原因导致的受限治疗可及性和治疗时长缩短之间存在统计学上的显著关联。与私人非营利性机构和公共机构相比,私人营利性机构提供初始治疗的可能性较小,并且报告称,在无力支付费用的客户中,有更大比例的人治疗时长缩短。其他机构特征,如美沙酮维持治疗项目和参与管理式医疗,也与限制治疗可及性有关。虽然这项研究并未确定可及性限制背后的潜在动机,但所有权结构的持续变化应引起政策制定者的更多关注。