• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为重度精神疾病患者实施疾病管理与康复项目。

Implementing the illness management and recovery program for consumers with severe mental illness.

作者信息

Salyers Michelle P, Godfrey Jenna L, McGuire Alan B, Gearhart Tim, Rollins Angela L, Boyle Charles

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):483-90. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.483.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.483
PMID:19339323
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the statewide implementation of the illness management and recovery program, a curriculum-based intervention for adults with severe mental illnesses.

METHODS

Using knowledge gained from the National Evidence-Based Practices Project, the ACT Center of Indiana assisted seven community mental health centers with implementation of the illness management and recovery program. Implementation was conducted by trainers, who provided in-depth skills training, ongoing monitoring and supervision, and consultation as needed. At six and 12 months, the fidelity of implementation was assessed by use of the Illness Management and Recovery Fidelity Scale, and changes in illness self-management, hope, and satisfaction with services were assessed for 324 consumers with severe mental illness by use of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale, the Adult State Hope Scale, and the Satisfaction With Services Scale, respectively.

RESULTS

The illness management and recovery program was successfully implemented at six of seven sites; five sites achieved high fidelity by 12 months and the sixth by 24 months. Self-reports of consumers and clinicians indicated significant changes in illness self-management. Consumers reported increased hope but no changes in satisfaction with services.

CONCLUSIONS

The illness management and recovery program can be implemented with a high degree of fidelity and may be a meaningful way for mental health providers to promote recovery and provide an evidence-based intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估疾病管理与康复项目在全州范围内的实施情况,该项目是针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人的一项基于课程的干预措施。

方法

利用从国家循证实践项目中获得的知识,印第安纳州ACT中心协助七个社区心理健康中心实施疾病管理与康复项目。实施工作由培训人员进行,他们提供深入的技能培训、持续的监测和监督,并根据需要提供咨询。在6个月和12个月时,使用疾病管理与康复保真度量表评估实施的保真度,并分别使用疾病管理与康复量表、成人状态希望量表和服务满意度量表,对324名患有严重精神疾病的消费者的疾病自我管理、希望和服务满意度的变化进行评估。

结果

疾病管理与康复项目在七个地点中的六个成功实施;五个地点在12个月时达到高保真度,第六个在24个月时达到。消费者和临床医生的自我报告表明,疾病自我管理有显著变化。消费者报告希望增加,但服务满意度没有变化。

结论

疾病管理与康复项目可以高度保真地实施,可能是心理健康提供者促进康复和提供循证干预的一种有意义的方式。

相似文献

1
Implementing the illness management and recovery program for consumers with severe mental illness.为重度精神疾病患者实施疾病管理与康复项目。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):483-90. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.483.
2
Illness Management & Recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands; a naturalistic pilot study to explore the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial.荷兰的疾病管理与康复(IMR);一项探索随机对照试验可行性的自然主义试点研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1096-y.
3
Development of an e-supported illness management and recovery programme for consumers with severe mental illness using intervention mapping, and design of an early cluster randomized controlled trial.使用干预映射法为重度精神疾病患者开发电子支持的疾病管理与康复项目,并设计一项早期整群随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 19;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1267-z.
4
Statewide implementation of high-fidelity recovery-oriented ACT: A case study.全州范围内实施高保真的以康复为导向的积极社区治疗:一项案例研究。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 26;2:2633489521994938. doi: 10.1177/2633489521994938. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Integrating assertive community treatment and illness management and recovery for consumers with severe mental illness.将强化社区治疗和疾病管理与康复相结合,用于治疗严重精神疾病患者。
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9284-6. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
6
Implementing the illness management and recovery program in community mental health settings: facilitators and barriers.在社区心理健康环境中实施疾病管理与康复项目:促进因素与障碍
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Feb;60(2):202-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.2.202.
7
A community-based peer support service for persons with severe mental illness in China.中国严重精神障碍患者的基于社区的同伴支持服务。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1763-2.
8
Barriers and facilitators in implementing illness management and recovery for consumers with severe mental illness: trainee perspectives.为重度精神疾病患者实施疾病管理与康复的障碍及促进因素:实习生观点
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Mar;36(2):102-11. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0200-0. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
9
Impact of illness management and recovery programs on hospital and emergency room use by Medicaid enrollees.医疗补助计划参保者的疾病管理和康复计划对医院和急诊室使用的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):509-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0509.
10
The Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) Program: a peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illness.健康与康复同伴(HARP)计划:一种同伴主导的干预措施,旨在改善严重精神疾病患者的医疗自我管理。
Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.026. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study.提供疾病管理和康复方面的保真度和临床能力:一项探索性研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Nov;59(8):1508-1520. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01137-7. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
A systematic review of influences on implementation of supported self-management interventions for people with severe mental health problems in secondary mental health care settings.系统评价二级精神卫生保健环境中支持性自我管理干预措施实施的影响因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0282157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282157. eCollection 2023.
3
Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
精神障碍患者家庭参与指南实施(IFIP):一项集群随机对照试验。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 May;50(3):520-533. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01255-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Effects of Self-Care Education Intervention Program (SCEIP) on Activation Level, Psychological Distress, and Treatment-Related Information.自我护理教育干预项目(SCEIP)对激活水平、心理困扰及治疗相关信息的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 18;10(8):1572. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081572.
5
A Smartphone-Based Self-management Intervention for Individuals With Bipolar Disorder (LiveWell): Empirical and Theoretical Framework, Intervention Design, and Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对双相情感障碍患者的基于智能手机的自我管理干预措施(“活得健康”):随机对照试验的实证与理论框架、干预设计及研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 21;11(2):e30710. doi: 10.2196/30710.
6
A Smartphone-Based Self-Management Intervention for Individuals with Bipolar Disorder (LiveWell): Qualitative Study on User Experiences of the Behavior Change Process.一项针对双相情感障碍患者的基于智能手机的自我管理干预措施(LiveWell):行为改变过程用户体验的定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 22;8(11):e32306. doi: 10.2196/32306.
7
A Smartphone-Based Self-management Intervention for Bipolar Disorder (LiveWell): User-Centered Development Approach.一种基于智能手机的双相情感障碍自我管理干预措施(LiveWell):以用户为中心的开发方法。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Apr 12;8(4):e20424. doi: 10.2196/20424.
8
Development of Coaching Support for LiveWell: A Smartphone-Based Self-Management Intervention for Bipolar Disorder.为“健康生活”(LiveWell)开发指导支持:一种基于智能手机的双相情感障碍自我管理干预措施。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 24;5(3):e25810. doi: 10.2196/25810.
9
Identifying the minimal important difference in patient-reported outcome measures in the field of people with severe mental illness: a pre-post-analysis of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme.确定严重精神疾病患者患者报告结局测量中的最小临床重要差异:疾病管理和康复计划的前后分析。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1723-1733. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02779-4. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Psychometric Properties of the General Organizational Index (GOI): A Measure of Individualization and Quality Improvement to Complement Program Fidelity.一般组织指数(GOI)的心理测量特性:一种补充计划一致性的个性化和质量改进的衡量标准。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Nov;47(6):920-926. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01025-2.