• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A case study of use of data for participatory evaluation within a statewide system to prevent substance abuse.

作者信息

Collie-Akers Vicki L, Watson-Thompson Jomella, Schultz Jerry A, Fawcett Stephen B

机构信息

Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2010 Nov;11(6):852-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839909331553. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1177/1524839909331553
PMID:19339643
Abstract

Although evaluation is considered an essential component of community health initiatives, its function requires actual use of the data to inform practice. The purpose of this case study was to examine how often and in what ways practitioners in a state system for substance abuse prevention used participatory evaluation data. To assess uses of data, interviews and surveys (N = 13) were conducted with practitioners. Questions focused on the frequency of use for several functions of evaluation data. Results showed that 77% of participants reported using their data within the past 30 days to review progress of the initiative, and 64% had used the data to communicate successes or needed improvement to staff. Fewer participants indicated they had used the data to communicate accomplishments to stakeholders (54%) or to make adjustments to plans (38%). This study suggests that participatory evaluation data can have multiple functions and uses for community health practitioners.

摘要

相似文献

1
A case study of use of data for participatory evaluation within a statewide system to prevent substance abuse.
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Nov;11(6):852-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839909331553. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
2
Participatory monitoring and evaluation within a statewide support system to prevent adolescent substance abuse.在全州范围内预防青少年药物滥用支持系统中的参与式监测与评估。
J Prev Interv Community. 2013;41(3):188-200. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2013.788347.
3
Evaluating community initiatives for health and development.评估社区健康与发展倡议。
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2001(92):241-70.
4
The prevention delivery system: organizational context and use of comprehensive programming frameworks.预防服务提供系统:组织背景与综合规划框架的应用
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):361-78. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9164-1.
5
Phoenix Rising: use of a participatory approach to evaluate a federally funded HIV, hepatitis and substance abuse prevention program.凤凰崛起:采用参与式方法评估一项由联邦政府资助的艾滋病毒、肝炎和药物滥用预防项目。
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Nov;33(4):386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
6
Substance abuse prevention infrastructure: a survey-based study of the organizational structure and function of the D.A.R.E. program.药物滥用预防基础设施:一项基于调查的关于毒品滥用抵抗教育(D.A.R.E.)项目组织结构与功能的研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Sep 6;1:25. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-25.
7
Substance use prevention for adolescents: the Icelandic Model.青少年物质使用预防:冰岛模式。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan038. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
8
Evaluation of a community approach to address substance abuse in Appalachia.
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2009;30(2):171-83. doi: 10.2190/IQ.30.2.f.
9
The potential contribution of realistic evaluation to small-scale community interventions.现实评估对小规模社区干预措施的潜在贡献。
Community Pract. 2008 Sep;81(9):25-8.
10
Project Towards No Drug Abuse: long-term substance use outcomes evaluation.无药物滥用项目:长期药物使用结果评估。
Prev Med. 2006 Mar;42(3):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Jan 18.