Lanzino Giuseppe, Rabinstein Alejandro A, Brown Robert D
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Apr;84(4):362-87; quiz 367-8. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60546-6.
With the aging of the general population and the availability of noninvasive imaging studies, carotid artery stenosis is a disease commonly seen in general medical practice. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic disease is critical to the treatment course because the natural history differs markedly between them. Antiplatelet therapy and aggressive treatment of vascular risk factors are the mainstays of medical therapy. Class I evidence shows that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective in preventing ipsilateral ischemic events in patients with symptomatic moderate- and high-grade stenosis. The procedure is also effective in selected patients with asymptomatic stenosis, but the benefit is marginal. In the past decade, carotid angioplasty and stenting has been proposed as a valid alternative to CEA. Currently, it is unclear whether carotid angioplasty and stenting is as safe as CEA in patients with carotid artery stenosis who need invasive treatment. Large clinical trials are under way to answer this question.
随着普通人群的老龄化以及无创成像研究的应用,颈动脉狭窄是普通医疗实践中常见的一种疾病。区分有症状和无症状疾病对于治疗过程至关重要,因为它们的自然病程有显著差异。抗血小板治疗和积极控制血管危险因素是药物治疗的主要手段。一级证据表明,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对于预防有症状的中度和高度狭窄患者的同侧缺血性事件是有效的。该手术对部分无症状狭窄患者也有效,但益处不大。在过去十年中,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术已被提议作为CEA的一种有效替代方法。目前,对于需要进行侵入性治疗的颈动脉狭窄患者,尚不清楚颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术是否与CEA一样安全。正在进行大型临床试验以回答这个问题。