Trivedi Madhukar H, Daly Ella J
Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May;88 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
Despite years of antidepressant drug development and patient and provider education, suboptimal medication dosing and duration of exposure resulting in incomplete remission of symptoms remains the norm in the treatment of depression. Additionally, since no one treatment is effective for all patients, optimal implementation focusing on the measurement of symptoms, side effects, and function is essential to determine effective sequential treatment approaches. There is a need for a paradigm shift in how clinical decision making is incorporated into clinical practice and for a move away from the trial-and-error approach that currently determines the "next best" treatment. This paper describes how our experience with the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) and the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial has confirmed the need for easy-to-use clinical support systems to ensure fidelity to guidelines. To further enhance guideline fidelity, we have developed an electronic decision support system that provides critical feedback and guidance at the point of patient care. We believe that a measurement-based care (MBC) approach is essential to any decision support system, allowing physicians to individualize and adapt decisions about patient care based on symptom progress, tolerability of medication, and dose optimization. We also believe that successful integration of sequential algorithms with MBC into real-world clinics will facilitate change that will endure and improve patient outcomes. Although we use major depression to illustrate our approach, the issues addressed are applicable to other chronic psychiatric conditions including comorbid depression and substance use disorder as well as other medical illnesses.
尽管多年来一直在进行抗抑郁药物研发,并对患者和医疗服务提供者开展教育,但在抑郁症治疗中,药物剂量未达最佳标准以及暴露时间不足导致症状未完全缓解的情况仍然很常见。此外,由于没有一种治疗方法对所有患者都有效,因此,注重症状、副作用和功能测量的最佳治疗实施对于确定有效的序贯治疗方法至关重要。在如何将临床决策纳入临床实践方面,需要进行范式转变,摒弃目前用于确定“次优”治疗方法的试错法。本文描述了我们在德克萨斯药物算法项目(TMAP)和缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗替代方案(STAR*D)试验中的经验,证实了需要易于使用的临床支持系统以确保遵循指南。为进一步提高指南遵循度,我们开发了一种电子决策支持系统,该系统在患者护理点提供关键反馈和指导。我们认为,基于测量的护理(MBC)方法对于任何决策支持系统都至关重要,它能让医生根据症状进展、药物耐受性和剂量优化来个性化并调整有关患者护理的决策。我们还认为,将序贯算法与MBC成功整合到现实世界的诊所中将促进持久的变革并改善患者预后。尽管我们以重度抑郁症为例来说明我们的方法,但所涉及的问题适用于其他慢性精神疾病,包括共病抑郁症和物质使用障碍以及其他医学疾病。