• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后1年死亡率。

Predicting 1-year mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

作者信息

Beck Adam W, Goodney Philip P, Nolan Brian W, Likosky Donald S, Eldrup-Jorgensen Jens, Cronenwett Jack L

机构信息

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.067.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.067
PMID:19341875
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Benefit of prophylactic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair requires sufficient survival to overcome operative risk. Since death within 1 year of elective open or endovascular (EVAR) infrarenal AAA repair likely indicates ineffective treatment, we developed a prediction model for 1-year mortality to aid clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We used a prospective registry of 1387 consecutive patients who had undergone elective AAA repair from 2003 to 2007 by 50 surgeons from 11 hospitals in Northern New England. Cox proportional hazards were used to analyze potential risk factors for 1-year mortality, including medical comorbidities, aortic clamp site, preoperative risk factor modification (eg, beta-blockade), and aneurysm diameter.

RESULTS

Thirty-day and 1-year mortality after open repair (n = 748) was 2.3% and 5.8%, and after EVAR (n = 639) was 0.5% and 5.7%, respectively. Factors associated with death within 1-year after open repair were: age >/= 70 (P = .007; hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-6.3), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P < .0001; HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-7.0), chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine >/= 1.8) (P = .008; HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.2) and suprarenal aortic clamp site (P < .0001; HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.9-7.5). Depending on the number of risk factors present, predicted 1-year mortality after open repair varied from 1% in patients with no risk factors to 67% in patients with four risk factors. Our model demonstrated excellent correlation between observed and expected deaths (r = 0.97). For EVAR, identified risk factors for death within 1 year included a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) (P = .002; HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.5), and aneurysm diameter >/=6.5 cm (P = .04 95% CI 1.0-4.8). Depending on the number of risk factors present, predicted mortality ranged from 3.6% to 23%. A model using CHF and aneurysm diameter correlated well with actual mortality rates, with an observed to expected ratio of 0.96.

CONCLUSION

Predictors of 1-year mortality can identify patients less likely to benefit from elective AAA repair. These factors differ for open repair vs EVAR and should be considered in individual patient decision-making. Our EVAR model had less impact on 1-year survival, even if CHF and large AAA diameter were present. However, a combination of age, COPD, renal insufficiency, and need for suprarenal clamping have significant impact on 1-year mortality after open AAA repair. Consideration of these variables should assist decision-making for elective AAA repair, especially in borderline cases.

摘要

目的

预防性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复的益处需要足够的生存期以克服手术风险。由于择期开放性或血管腔内修复术(EVAR)治疗肾下腹主动脉瘤后1年内死亡可能表明治疗无效,我们开发了一种1年死亡率预测模型以辅助临床决策。

方法

我们使用了一个前瞻性登记数据库,纳入了2003年至2007年期间新英格兰北部11家医院的50名外科医生连续收治的1387例行择期AAA修复术的患者。采用Cox比例风险模型分析1年死亡率的潜在危险因素,包括内科合并症、主动脉阻断部位、术前危险因素调整(如β受体阻滞剂使用情况)以及动脉瘤直径。

结果

开放性修复术(n = 748)后30天和1年死亡率分别为2.3%和5.8%,EVAR术后(n = 639)分别为0.5%和5.7%。开放性修复术后1年内死亡相关因素包括:年龄≥70岁(P = 0.007;风险比[HR] 2.9,95%置信区间[CI] 1.3 - 6.3)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病史(P < 0.0001;HR 3.6,95% CI 1.9 - 7.0)、慢性肾功能不全(肌酐≥1.8)(P = 0.008;HR 2.8,95% CI 1.3 - 6.2)以及肾上主动脉阻断部位(P < 0.0001;HR 3.8,95% CI 1.9 - 7.5)。根据存在的危险因素数量,开放性修复术后预测的1年死亡率从无危险因素患者的1%到有4个危险因素患者的67%不等。我们的模型显示观察到的死亡与预期死亡之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.97)。对于EVAR,确定的1年内死亡危险因素包括充血性心力衰竭(CHF)病史(P = 0.002;HR 3.2,95% CI 1.6 - 6.5)以及动脉瘤直径≥6.5 cm(P = 0.04,95% CI 1.0 - 4.8)。根据存在的危险因素数量,预测死亡率范围为3.6%至23%。使用CHF和动脉瘤直径的模型与实际死亡率相关性良好,观察值与预期值之比为0.96。

结论

1年死亡率预测指标可识别出不太可能从择期AAA修复术中获益的患者。这些因素在开放性修复术与EVAR之间有所不同,在个体患者决策时应予以考虑。即使存在CHF和较大的AAA直径,我们的EVAR模型对1年生存率的影响较小。然而,年龄、COPD、肾功能不全以及肾上阻断需求的综合因素对开放性AAA修复术后1年死亡率有显著影响。考虑这些变量应有助于择期AAA修复术的决策,尤其是在临界病例中。

相似文献

1
Predicting 1-year mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后1年死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.067.
2
Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放性复杂腹主动脉瘤修复术的当代疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.038.
3
Mortality variability after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large tertiary vascular center using a Medicare-derived risk prediction model.在一家大型三级血管中心,使用源自医疗保险的风险预测模型比较血管内修复与开放性腹主动脉瘤修复后的死亡率变异性。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.078. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
4
Limited survival in dialysis patients undergoing intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.接受完整腹主动脉瘤修复术的透析患者生存率有限。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):908-13.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.050. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Defining risk and identifying predictors of mortality for open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.定义血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术后开放转换的风险并确定死亡预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):873-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.058. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
6
Optimal selection of patients for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on life expectancy.基于预期寿命选择择期腹主动脉瘤修复的最佳患者。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Novel Risk Score Model for Prediction of Survival Following Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.用于预测择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后生存情况的新型风险评分模型
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 May;50(4):261-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574416638760. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Differences in patient selection and outcomes based on abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter thresholds in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中基于腹主动脉瘤直径阈值的患者选择和结局差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;70(5):1446-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Suprarenal aortic cross-clamp position: a reappraisal of its effects on outcomes for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.肾上腺主动脉交叉钳夹位置:对其对开放性腹主动脉瘤修复结局影响的重新评估
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):873-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.057. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
Comparable mortality with open repair of complex and infrarenal aortic aneurysm.开放修复复杂型和肾下型腹主动脉瘤的死亡率相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):952-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.231. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
hort and one-year outcome of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术(EVAR)的短期和一年期预后
ARYA Atheroscler. 2022 May;18(5):2518. doi: 10.48305/arya.2022.16298.2518. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Prognostic value of extended cardiac risk assessment before elective open abdominal aortic surgery.择期开放腹主动脉手术前扩展心脏风险评估的预后价值。
Herz. 2024 Jun;49(3):210-218. doi: 10.1007/s00059-023-05209-y. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Risk Factors in 65-Year-Old Men in Oslo, Norway.
挪威奥斯陆 65 岁男性的腹主动脉瘤筛查及危险因素。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Sep 10;17:561-570. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S310358. eCollection 2021.
4
Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers in 5-Year Survival After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Predominantly Male Cohort: Implications for Practice.炎症标志物对男性为主的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后 5 年生存率的预后价值:对实践的启示。
World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1949-1955. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06051-1. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Outcomes of Vascular and Endovascular Interventions Performed During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.血管和血管内介入治疗在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):630-635. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004722.
6
Association of High Mortality With Postoperative Myocardial Infarction After Major Vascular Surgery Despite Use of Evidence-Based Therapies.尽管采用了循证治疗,但大血管手术后的高死亡率与术后心肌梗死有关。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Feb 1;155(2):131-137. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4908.
7
Five-year results of endovascular aortic repair used according to instructions for use give a good general outcome for abdominal aortic aneurysm.按照使用说明进行的血管内主动脉修复五年结果显示,腹主动脉瘤总体预后良好。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 May 23;7:2050312119853434. doi: 10.1177/2050312119853434. eCollection 2019.
8
Extended Serum Lipid Profile Predicting Long-Term Survival in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.扩展血脂谱预测腹主动脉瘤治疗患者的长期生存情况
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):1200-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4281-3.
9
Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.(在国家外科质量改进计划中),接受腹主动脉瘤修复手术的患者在目标医院和非目标医院之间的选择及围手术期结果相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.066. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair conversion and primary aortic repair for urgent and emergency indications in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量改进项目中,血管内动脉瘤修复术转换及原发性主动脉修复术治疗紧急和急诊指征后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Jun 7.