Suppr超能文献

期望就意味着实现吗?挥鞭样相关疾病中期望恢复工作与康复之间的关联:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。

Does expecting mean achieving? The association between expecting to return to work and recovery in whiplash associated disorders: a population-based prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Ozegovic Dejan, Carroll Linda J, David Cassidy J

机构信息

Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 RTF, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E1.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):893-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0954-4. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

Abstract

To determine the association between expectations to return to work and self-assessed recovery. Positive expectations predict better outcomes in many health conditions, but to date the relationship between expecting to return to work after traffic-related whiplash-associated disorders and actual recovery has not been reported. We assessed early expectations for return to work in a cohort of 2,335 individuals with traffic-related whiplash injury to the neck. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis we assessed the association between return to work expectations and self-perceived recovery during the first year following the event. After adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, initial pain and symptoms, post-crash mood, prior health status and collision-related factors, those who expected to return to work reported global recovery 42% more quickly than those who did not have positive expectations (HRR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.26-1.60). Knowledge of return to work expectation provides an important prognostic tool to clinicians for recovery.

摘要

确定重返工作岗位的期望与自我评估的恢复之间的关联。在许多健康状况下,积极的期望预示着更好的结果,但迄今为止,与交通相关的挥鞭样损伤相关疾病后重返工作岗位的期望与实际恢复之间的关系尚未见报道。我们在一个由2335名颈部遭受与交通相关的挥鞭样损伤的个体组成的队列中评估了早期重返工作岗位的期望。使用多变量Cox比例风险分析,我们评估了事件发生后第一年重返工作岗位的期望与自我感知恢复之间的关联。在调整了社会人口学特征、初始疼痛和症状、碰撞后情绪、既往健康状况以及与碰撞相关的因素的影响后,期望重返工作岗位的人报告的整体恢复速度比没有积极期望的人快42%(风险比=1.42,95%置信区间1.26-1.60)。了解重返工作岗位的期望为临床医生提供了一个重要的恢复预后工具。

相似文献

8
Work disability after whiplash: a prospective cohort study.挥鞭伤后的工作残疾:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):262-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181913d07.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Key factors in back disability prevention: a consensus panel on their impact and modifiability.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):807-15. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259080.51541.17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验