Morris J J, Smith L R, Jones R H, Glower D D, Morris P B, Muhlbaier L H, Reves J G, Rankin J S
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III275-84.
The effect of diabetes on survival after coronary bypass surgery is uncertain. Also, although the overall clinical benefits of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting are well established, the survival benefit attributable to IMA grafting in diabetics is not well characterized. To determine the influence of diabetes and IMA grafting on survival after bypass surgery in the current surgical era, characteristics related to subsequent outcome were analyzed in 5,654 consecutive patients undergoing surgery in the decade of the 1980s. The 1,132 diabetic patients (20%) had more extensive coronary disease, had more left ventricular dysfunction, were older, were more frequently female, received a greater number of grafts (mean, 3.5 versus 3.1), and received more IMA grafts (67% versus 58%) than the 4,522 nondiabetic patients (all p less than 0.001). Overall 5-year survival probability was 0.91 in nondiabetic and 0.80 in diabetic patients (p less than 0.0001). Nondiabetic survival exceeded diabetic survival even in high-risk subgroups such as ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.40 (0.80 versus 0.66, p less than 0.02), age greater than or equal to 65 years (0.85 versus 0.73, p less than 0.0003), and, urgent surgery (0.89 versus 0.76, p less than 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, impairment of left ventricular function, advanced age, failure to use an IMA graft, diabetes, female sex, urgent surgery, number of diseased vessels, and mitral insufficiency were incremental risk factors for cardiac mortality (all p less than 0.006). Failure to use an IMA graft and diabetes were equally strong predictors of outcome. Use of an IMA graft conveyed an independent survival benefit to both nondiabetic (p less than 0.0001) and diabetic (p less than 0.02) patients. The magnitude of the survival benefit attributable to IMA grafting in the two groups did not differ (p = 0.4). Diabetes is an important risk factor for late cardiac mortality after bypass surgery and should be included in analyses of the efficacy of therapies for coronary artery disease. IMA grafting conveys a similar benefit to diabetic and nondiabetic patients but does not negate the adverse effect of diabetes on survival.
糖尿病对冠状动脉搭桥手术后生存率的影响尚不确定。此外,尽管乳内动脉(IMA)移植的总体临床益处已得到充分证实,但IMA移植对糖尿病患者生存率的益处尚未得到充分描述。为了确定在当前手术时代糖尿病和IMA移植对搭桥手术后生存率的影响,我们分析了20世纪80年代连续接受手术的5654例患者与后续结果相关的特征。1132例糖尿病患者(20%)比4522例非糖尿病患者有更广泛的冠状动脉疾病、更多的左心室功能障碍、年龄更大、女性更常见、接受的移植血管数量更多(平均3.5条对3.1条),且接受IMA移植的比例更高(67%对58%)(所有p均小于0.001)。非糖尿病患者的总体5年生存概率为0.91,糖尿病患者为0.80(p小于0.0001)。即使在高危亚组中,如射血分数小于或等于0.40(0.80对0.66,p小于0.02)、年龄大于或等于65岁(0.85对0.73,p小于0.0003)以及急诊手术(0.89对0.76,p小于0.0001),非糖尿病患者的生存率也超过糖尿病患者。通过多变量分析,左心室功能损害、高龄、未使用IMA移植、糖尿病、女性、急诊手术、病变血管数量和二尖瓣关闭不全是心脏死亡的递增风险因素(所有p均小于0.006)。未使用IMA移植和糖尿病对结果的预测作用同样强烈。使用IMA移植对非糖尿病患者(p小于0.0001)和糖尿病患者(p小于0.02)均带来独立的生存益处。两组中IMA移植带来的生存益处程度无差异(p = 0.4)。糖尿病是搭桥手术后晚期心脏死亡的重要风险因素,应纳入冠状动脉疾病治疗疗效分析中。IMA移植对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者带来类似益处,但并不能消除糖尿病对生存的不利影响。