Stenlund T, Lidén E, Andersson K, Garvill J, Nordin S
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden.
Public Health. 2009 Apr;123(4):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.021. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Interventions for reducing air pollution are important means for improving public health. The role of psychological factors in understanding annoyance and health symptoms due to air pollution is limited and further investigation is required. This study aimed to investigate the effects of an intervention to reduce air pollution (predominantly dust and soot) with respect to perceived pollution, risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms. Another objective was to test a model that describes inter-relations between air pollution, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms.
An interventional, population-based questionnaire study.
Surveys were performed before (pre-test) and after (post-test) closure of a sinter plant. Instead, pellets were shipped to the community's harbour for steel production. Individuals in the community aged 18-75 years were selected at random for participation in the pre-test (n=738; 74% of the sample participated) and post-test (n=684; 68% of the sample participated). The two samples were representative of the populations at the two points in time, and thus not identical.
After the sinter plant was closed, the environment was perceived as being less dusty, the residents were more positive in their risk perception, and they reported less annoyance due to dust, soot and odorous substances. No difference was found for health symptoms between the pre-test and the post-test. Based on path analyses, a model is proposed of inter-relations between air pollution, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms.
The intervention was successful with respect to perceived dust and soot pollution; to annoyance attributed to dust, soot and odorous substances; and to risk perception. The path analyses suggest that perceived pollution and health risk perception play important roles in understanding and predicting environmentally induced annoyance and health symptoms.
减少空气污染的干预措施是改善公众健康的重要手段。心理因素在理解空气污染所致烦恼和健康症状方面的作用有限,需要进一步研究。本研究旨在调查减少空气污染(主要是粉尘和烟尘)的干预措施对感知污染、风险认知、烦恼和健康症状的影响。另一个目的是检验一个描述空气污染、感知污染、健康风险认知、烦恼和健康症状之间相互关系的模型。
一项基于人群的干预性问卷调查研究。
在烧结厂关闭前(预测试)和关闭后(后测试)进行调查。取而代之的是,球团被运往社区港口用于钢铁生产。随机选择社区中18 - 75岁的个体参与预测试(n = 738;样本参与率为74%)和后测试(n = 684;样本参与率为68%)。这两个样本分别代表两个时间点的人群,因此并不相同。
烧结厂关闭后,人们感觉环境中的灰尘减少了,居民对风险的认知更为积极,他们报告称因灰尘、烟尘和异味物质而产生的烦恼减少了。预测试和后测试之间在健康症状方面未发现差异。基于路径分析,提出了一个关于空气污染、感知污染、健康风险认知、烦恼和健康症状之间相互关系的模型。
该干预措施在减少感知到的粉尘和烟尘污染、减少因灰尘、烟尘和异味物质引起的烦恼以及改善风险认知方面取得了成功。路径分析表明,感知污染和健康风险认知在理解和预测环境引起 的烦恼和健康症状方面起着重要作用。