Swann Alan C, Lijffijt Marijn, Lane Scott D, Steinberg Joel L, Moeller F Gerard
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1300 Moursund Street, Room 270, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Aug;43(12):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
Impulsive behavior is a prominent characteristic of antisocial personality disorder. Impulsivity is a complex construct, however, representing distinct domains of cognition and action. Leading models refer to impulsivity as an inability to evaluate a stimulus fully before responding to it (rapid-response impulsivity), and as an inability to delay responding despite a larger reward (reward-delay impulsivity). We investigated these models in terms of the diagnosis and severity of antisocial personality disorder.
Thirty-four male subjects on probation/parole who met DSM-IV criteria for ASPD, and 30 male healthy comparison subjects, matched by ethnicity, were recruited from the community. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) provided an integrated measure of trait impulsivity. Rapid-response impulsivity was assessed using the Immediate Memory Task (IMT), a continuous performance test. Reward delay impulsivity was assessed using the Two-choice Impulsivity Paradigm (TCIP), where subjects had the choice of smaller-sooner or larger-delayed rewards, and the Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm (SKIP), a free-operant responding task.
Compared to controls, subjects with ASPD had higher BIS-11 scores (Effect Size (E.S.)=0.95). They had slower reaction times to IMT commission errors (E.S.=0.45). Correct detections, a measure of attention, were identical to controls. On the SKIP, they had a shorter maximum delay for reward (E.S.=0.76), but this was not significant after correction for age and education. The groups did not differ on impulsive choices on the TCIP (E.S.<0.1). On probit analysis with age and education as additional independent variables, BIS-11 score, IMT reaction time to a commission error, and IMT positive response bias contributed significantly to diagnosis of ASPD; SKIP delay for reward did not. Severity of ASPD, assessed by the number of ASPD symptoms endorsed on the SCID-II, correlated significantly with commission errors (impulsive responses) on the IMT, and with liberal IMT response bias. This relationship persisted with correction for age and education.
These results suggest that ASPD is characterized by increased rapid-response impulsivity. Aspects of impulsivity related to reward-delay or attention appear relatively intact.
冲动行为是反社会人格障碍的一个突出特征。然而,冲动性是一个复杂的概念,代表着认知和行为的不同领域。主流模型将冲动性定义为在对刺激做出反应之前无法充分评估该刺激(快速反应冲动性),以及尽管有更大的奖励但仍无法延迟反应(奖励延迟冲动性)。我们从反社会人格障碍的诊断和严重程度方面对这些模型进行了研究。
从社区招募了34名符合DSM-IV反社会人格障碍标准的缓刑/假释男性受试者,以及30名与之种族匹配的健康男性对照受试者。巴拉特冲动性量表(BIS-11)提供了特质冲动性的综合测量。使用即时记忆任务(IMT,一种连续操作测试)评估快速反应冲动性。使用二选一冲动范式(TCIP,受试者可选择较小但更快或较大但更延迟的奖励)和单键冲动范式(SKIP,一种自由操作反应任务)评估奖励延迟冲动性。
与对照组相比,反社会人格障碍受试者的BIS-11得分更高(效应量(E.S.)=0.95)。他们对IMT执行错误的反应时间较慢(E.S.=0.45)。作为注意力测量指标的正确检测与对照组相同。在SKIP任务中,他们获得奖励的最大延迟时间较短(E.S.=0.76),但在对年龄和教育程度进行校正后,这一差异不显著。两组在TCIP上的冲动选择没有差异(E.S.<0.1)。在以年龄和教育程度作为额外自变量的概率分析中,BIS-11得分、IMT对执行错误的反应时间以及IMT的阳性反应偏差对反社会人格障碍的诊断有显著贡献;SKIP任务中获得奖励的延迟时间则没有。通过在SCID-II上认可的反社会人格障碍症状数量评估的反社会人格障碍严重程度,与IMT上的执行错误(冲动反应)以及宽松的IMT反应偏差显著相关。在对年龄和教育程度进行校正后,这种关系仍然存在。
这些结果表明,反社会人格障碍的特征是快速反应冲动性增加。与奖励延迟或注意力相关的冲动性方面似乎相对完好。