Swann Alan C, Lijffijt Marijn, Lane Scott D, Steinberg Joel L, Moeller F Gerard
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 77030, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jul;116(1-2):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
Pathological impulsivity in bipolar disorder could be related to deficiencies in mechanisms involved in attention or response inhibition. We investigated these mechanisms in subjects with bipolar disorder and examined relationships to severity of course of illness, use of medication, affective state, age, education, and gender. We measured two complementary aspects of response inhibition: attention-based and reward-based.
Subjects with bipolar disorder (n=112) and healthy controls (n=71) were recruited from the community. Diagnoses were rendered using the SCID for DSMIV. Impulsivity-related measures included the Immediate Memory Task (IMT), a form of the Continuous Performance Task, and the Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm (SKIP), an operant procedure measuring ability to delay responding for a reward.
Subjects with bipolar disorder had fewer correct detections (Effect Size (ES)=0.5), prolonged reaction times (ES=0.88), and decreased discriminability (ES=0.57) on the IMT compared to controls. History of frequent episodes, substance use disorders, or suicide attempts predicted faster reaction times, especially to a commission error. Subjects with bipolar disorder who also met criteria for an Axis II disorder had fewer correct detections, more commission errors relative to correct detections, and poorer discriminability on the IMT than other subjects with bipolar disorder. Subjects with bipolar disorder made more responses on the SKIP than did controls (ES=0.5), with a shorter maximum delay (ES=0.62), consistent with inability to delay reward. Probit analysis showed that faster reaction time to a commission error on the IMT was associated with history of substance use disorder, suicide attempt, or many previous episodes. Effects of medication or affective state did not account for these differences.
Bipolar disorder was associated with impairment in attention and response inhibition, encompassing impaired inhibition of rapid responses and an inability to delay reward, and resulting in impulsivity. Response inhibition mechanisms are impaired further in subjects with more severe complications of illness.
双相情感障碍中的病理性冲动可能与注意力或反应抑制相关机制的缺陷有关。我们在双相情感障碍患者中研究了这些机制,并考察了它们与疾病病程严重程度、药物使用、情感状态、年龄、教育程度和性别的关系。我们测量了反应抑制的两个互补方面:基于注意力的和基于奖励的。
从社区招募双相情感障碍患者(n = 112)和健康对照者(n = 71)。使用针对DSM-IV的SCID进行诊断。与冲动相关的测量包括即时记忆任务(IMT),一种连续操作任务的形式,以及单键冲动范式(SKIP),一种测量为获得奖励而延迟反应能力的操作性程序。
与对照组相比,双相情感障碍患者在IMT上的正确检测次数更少(效应大小(ES)= 0.5),反应时间延长(ES = 0.88),辨别力降低(ES = 0.57)。频繁发作史、物质使用障碍或自杀未遂史预示着更快的反应时间,尤其是对执行错误的反应时间。同时符合轴II障碍标准的双相情感障碍患者与其他双相情感障碍患者相比,在IMT上的正确检测次数更少,相对于正确检测的执行错误更多,辨别力更差。双相情感障碍患者在SKIP上的反应比对照组更多(ES = 0.5),最大延迟更短(ES = 0.62),这与无法延迟奖励一致。概率分析表明,在IMT上对执行错误反应更快的反应时间与物质使用障碍史、自杀未遂史或多次既往发作有关。药物或情感状态的影响并不能解释这些差异。
双相情感障碍与注意力和反应抑制受损有关,包括对快速反应的抑制受损和无法延迟奖励,从而导致冲动。在疾病并发症更严重的患者中,反应抑制机制受损更严重。