Marin Daniele, Nelson Rendon C, Samei Ehsan, Paulson Erik K, Ho Lisa M, Boll Daniel T, DeLong David M, Yoshizumi Terry T, Schindera Sebastian T
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):771-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2513081330. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
To intraindividually compare a low tube voltage (80 kVp), high tube current computed tomographic (CT) technique with a standard CT protocol (140 kVp) in terms of image quality, radiation dose, and detection of malignant hypervascular liver tumors during the late hepatic arterial phase.
This prospective single-center HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained. Forty-eight patients (31 men, 17 women; age range, 35-77 years) with 60 malignant hypervascular liver tumors (mean diameter, 20.1 mm +/- 16.4 [standard deviation]) were enrolled. Pathologic proof of focal lesions was obtained with histopathologic analysis for 33 nodules and imaging follow-up after a minimum of 12 months for 27 nodules. Patients underwent dual-energy 64-section multi-detector row CT. By using vendor-specific software, two imaging protocols-140 kVp and 385 mA (protocol A) and 80 kVp and 675 mA (protocol B)-were compared during the late hepatic arterial phase of contrast enhancement. Paired t tests were used to compare tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each lesion, mean image noise, and effective dose between the two data sets. Three readers qualitatively assessed the two data sets in a blinded and independent fashion. Lesion detection and characterization and reader confidence were recorded, as well as readers' subjective evaluations of image quality. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistical analysis was performed on this assessment.
Image noise increased from 5.7 to 11.4 HU as the tube voltage decreased from 140 to 80 kVp (P < .0001), resulting in a significantly lower image quality score (4.0 vs 3.0, respectively) with protocol B according to all readers (P < .001). At the same time, protocol B yielded significantly higher CNR (8.2 vs 6.4) and lesion conspicuity scores (4.6 vs 4.1) than protocol A, along with a lower effective dose (5.1 vs 17.5 mSv) (P < .001 for all).
By substantially increasing the tumor-to-liver CNR, a low tube voltage, high tube current CT technique improves the conspicuity of malignant hypervascular liver tumors during the late hepatic arterial phase while significantly reducing patient radiation dose.
在肝脏动脉晚期,对低管电压(80 kVp)、高管电流计算机断层扫描(CT)技术与标准CT方案(140 kVp)进行个体内比较,比较内容包括图像质量、辐射剂量以及恶性富血供肝肿瘤的检测情况。
这项前瞻性单中心研究符合HIPAA规定,获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并取得了书面知情同意书。纳入了48例患者(31例男性,17例女性;年龄范围35 - 77岁),共60个恶性富血供肝肿瘤(平均直径20.1 mm±16.4[标准差])。33个结节通过组织病理学分析获得局灶性病变的病理证据,27个结节通过至少12个月的影像随访获得。患者接受双能量64层多排CT检查。使用特定厂商的软件,在对比增强的肝脏动脉晚期比较两种成像方案——140 kVp和385 mA(方案A)以及80 kVp和675 mA(方案B)。采用配对t检验比较每个病变的肿瘤与肝脏对比噪声比(CNR)、平均图像噪声以及两个数据集之间的有效剂量。三位阅片者以盲法和独立的方式对两个数据集进行定性评估。记录病变的检测与特征描述以及阅片者的信心,以及阅片者对图像质量的主观评价。对该评估进行Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney统计分析。
随着管电压从140 kVp降至80 kVp,图像噪声从5.7 HU增加至11.4 HU(P <.0001),根据所有阅片者的评估,方案B的图像质量得分显著更低(分别为4.0和3.0)(P <.001)。同时,方案B的CNR显著更高(8.2对6.4),病变显影得分(4.6对4.1)也高于方案A,且有效剂量更低(5.1对17.5 mSv)(所有P <.001)。
通过大幅提高肿瘤与肝脏的CNR,低管电压、高管电流CT技术在肝脏动脉晚期提高了恶性富血供肝肿瘤的显影效果,同时显著降低了患者的辐射剂量。