Suppr超能文献

胰腺实质期胰腺肿瘤的检出率、图像质量和辐射剂量:低管电压、高管电流 CT 技术的影响——初步结果。

Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):450-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091819.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To intraindividually compare a low-tube-voltage (80 kVp), high-tube-current (675 mA) computed tomographic (CT) technique with a high-tube-voltage (140 kVp) CT protocol for the detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-seven patients (nine men, 18 women; mean age, 64 years) with 23 solitary pancreatic tumors underwent dual-energy CT. Two imaging protocols were used: 140 kVp and 385 mA (protocol A) and 80 kVp and 675 mA (protocol B). For both protocols, the following variables were compared during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: contrast enhancement for the aorta, the pancreas, and the portal vein; pancreas-to-tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); noise; and effective dose. Two blinded, independent readers qualitatively scored the two data sets for tumor detection and image quality. Random-effect analysis of variance tests were used to compare differences between the two protocols.

RESULTS

Compared with protocol A, protocol B yielded significantly higher contrast enhancement for the aorta (508.6 HU vs 221.5 HU, respectively), pancreas (151.2 HU vs 67.0 HU), and portal vein (189.7 HU vs 87.3 HU), along with a greater pancreas-to-tumor CNR (8.1 vs 5.9) (P < .001 for all comparisons). No statistically significant difference in tumor detection was observed between the two protocols. Although standard deviation of image noise increased with protocol B (11.5 HU vs 18.6 HU), this protocol significantly reduced the effective dose (from 18.5 to 5.1 mSv; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique has the potential to improve the enhancement of the pancreas and peripancreatic vasculature, improve tumor conspicuity, and reduce patient radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase.

摘要

目的

在胰腺实质期,对低管电压(80kVp)、高管电流(675mA)的计算机断层扫描(CT)技术与高管电压(140kVp)CT 方案进行个体内比较,以检测胰腺肿瘤、图像质量和辐射剂量。

材料与方法

本前瞻性、单中心、符合 HIPAA 标准的研究经机构审查委员会批准,并获得了书面知情同意。27 例 23 个孤立性胰腺肿瘤患者(9 名男性,18 名女性;平均年龄 64 岁)行双能 CT 检查。采用两种成像方案:140kVp 与 385mA(方案 A)和 80kVp 与 675mA(方案 B)。在胰腺实质期,比较两种方案下的以下变量:主动脉、胰腺和门静脉的对比增强;胰腺与肿瘤的对比噪声比(CNR);噪声;有效剂量。两位盲法、独立的读者对两种数据集进行肿瘤检测和图像质量的定性评分。采用随机效应方差分析检验比较两种方案之间的差异。

结果

与方案 A 相比,方案 B 使主动脉(分别为 508.6HU 与 221.5HU)、胰腺(分别为 151.2HU 与 67.0HU)和门静脉(分别为 189.7HU 与 87.3HU)的对比增强显著提高,胰腺与肿瘤的 CNR 也更大(分别为 8.1 与 5.9)(所有比较 P<0.001)。两种方案之间的肿瘤检出率无统计学差异。虽然方案 B 图像噪声的标准差增加(分别为 11.5HU 与 18.6HU),但该方案显著降低了有效剂量(从 18.5mSv 降至 5.1mSv;P<0.001)。

结论

低管电压、高管电流 CT 技术有可能提高胰腺和胰周血管的增强程度,提高肿瘤的显示程度,并降低胰腺实质期的患者辐射剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验