Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center, Kameba 854-1, Amakusa, Kumamoto 863-0046, Japan.
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):467-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110021. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
To evaluate the feasibility of a low-contrast agent dose protocol at abdominal dynamic computed tomography (CT) with a low tube voltage high tube current-time product technique and a 256-detector row CT unit.
This prospective study received institutional review board approval; written informed consent to participate was obtained from all patients. The study included 151 patients; 117 had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). These patients were examined with the conventional 120-kVp protocol. The other 34 patients underwent scanning with an 80-kVp tube voltage, a high tube current-time product, and a 40% reduction in contrast agent dose. Effective dose (ED), image noise, attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit of the aorta in the arterial phase and of the portal vein and hepatic parenchyma in the portal venous phase in the two groups were compared with the Student t test.
Estimated ED was about 20% lower with the 80-kVp protocol than with the 120-kVp protocol. There were no significant differences in CNR in any region of interest between the 80-kVp protocol and the 120-kVp protocol (abdominal aorta: 36.9 ± 9.7 [standard deviation] vs 36.1 ± 8.1, P = .63; portal vein: 13.4 ± 3.2 vs 13.1 ± 3.2, P = .65; hepatic parenchyma: 6.4 ± 2.6 vs 6.7 ± 2.3, P = .51).
Contrast dose at hepatic dynamic 256-detector row CT in patients with renal dysfunction can be decreased by 40% with this protocol by using the 80-kVp setting and a high tube current-time product.
评估腹部动态 CT(计算机断层扫描)中低对比剂剂量方案的可行性,该方案采用低管电压高管电流时间乘积技术和 256 排 CT 机。
这项前瞻性研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准;所有患者均签署了参与研究的书面知情同意书。该研究共纳入 151 例患者;其中 117 例患者的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)大于或等于 60ml/min/1.73m²。这些患者采用常规 120kVp 方案进行检查。其余 34 例患者采用 80kVp 管电压、高管电流时间乘积和对比剂剂量减少 40%进行扫描。比较两组患者的动脉期主动脉、门静脉期门静脉和肝实质的有效剂量(ED)、图像噪声、衰减、对比噪声比(CNR)和品质因数。采用 Student t 检验进行比较。
80kVp 方案的 ED 比 120kVp 方案约低 20%。80kVp 方案与 120kVp 方案在任何感兴趣区域的 CNR 均无显著差异(腹主动脉:36.9±9.7[标准差]比 36.1±8.1,P=0.63;门静脉:13.4±3.2 比 13.1±3.2,P=0.65;肝实质:6.4±2.6 比 6.7±2.3,P=0.51)。
该方案采用 80kVp 设置和高管电流时间乘积,肾功能障碍患者的肝脏动态 256 排 CT 可减少 40%的对比剂剂量。