Suppr超能文献

抗凝治疗认知问卷(PACT-Q)的评分及心理测量学验证

Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q).

作者信息

Prins M H, Guillemin I, Gilet H, Gabriel S, Essers B, Raskob G, Kahn S R

机构信息

The Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institutes, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Apr 7;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'Perception of Anti-Coagulant Treatment Questionnaire' (PACT-Q) was developed to assess patients' expectations of, and satisfaction with their anticoagulant treatment. This questionnaire needs to be finalised and psychometrically validated.

METHODS

The PACT-Q was included in the United States, The Netherlands and France into three phase III multinational clinical trials conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new long-acting anticoagulant drug (idraparinux) compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA). PACT-Q was administered to patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), atrial fibrillation (AF) or pulmonary embolism (PE) at Day 1, to assess patients' expectations, and at 3 and 6 months to assess patients' satisfaction and treatment convenience and burden. The final structure of the PACT-Q (Principal Component Analysis--PCA--with Varimax Rotation) was first determined and its psychometric properties were then measured with validity of the structure (Multitrait analysis), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficients) and known-group validity.

RESULTS

PCA and multitrait analyses showed the multidimensionality of the "Treatment Expectations" dimension, comprising 7 items that had to be scored independently. The "Convenience" and "Burden of Disease and Treatment" dimensions of the hypothesised original structure of the questionnaire were combined, thus resulting in 13 items grouped into the single dimension "Convenience". The "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimension remained unchanged and included 7 items. All items of the "Convenience" and "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimensions displayed good convergent and discriminant validity. The internal consistency reliability was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 for the "Convenience" dimension, and 0.76 for the "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimension. Known-group validity was good, especially with regard to occurrence of thromboembolic events within 3 months from randomisation.

CONCLUSION

The PACT-Q is a valid and reliable instrument that allows the assessment of patients' expectations and satisfaction regarding anticoagulant treatment, as well as their opinion about treatment convenience of use. Its two-part structure--assessment of expectations at baseline in the first part, and of convenience, burden and treatment satisfaction in the second--was validated and displays good and stable psychometric properties. These results are not sufficient to recommend the use of satisfaction as primary endpoint in clinical trials; further validation work is needed to support the interpretation of PACT-Q dimension scores. However, this first validation makes the PACT-Q an appropriate measure for use in clinical and pharmacoepidemiological research, as well as in real-life studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093, NCT00062803 and NCT00070655).

摘要

背景

“抗凝治疗认知问卷”(PACT-Q)旨在评估患者对抗凝治疗的期望及满意度。该问卷需最终确定并进行心理测量学验证。

方法

PACT-Q被纳入美国、荷兰和法国开展的三项III期跨国临床试验,以评估一种新型长效抗凝药物(依达肝素)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)相比的疗效和安全性。在第1天对深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、心房颤动(AF)或肺栓塞(PE)患者进行PACT-Q问卷调查,以评估患者的期望;在3个月和6个月时进行调查,以评估患者的满意度、治疗便利性和负担。首先确定PACT-Q的最终结构(主成分分析——PCA——采用方差最大化旋转),然后通过结构效度(多特质分析)、内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α系数)和已知群组效度来测量其心理测量学特性。

结果

PCA和多特质分析显示“治疗期望”维度具有多维度性,该维度包含7个需独立评分的项目。问卷假设的原始结构中的“便利性”和“疾病与治疗负担”维度合并,从而形成了包含13个项目的单一维度“便利性”。“抗凝治疗满意度”维度保持不变,包含7个项目。“便利性”和“抗凝治疗满意度”维度的所有项目均显示出良好的收敛效度和区分效度。内部一致性信度良好,“便利性”维度的Cronbach's α为0.84,“抗凝治疗满意度”维度的Cronbach's α为0.76。已知群组效度良好,尤其是在随机分组后3个月内发生血栓栓塞事件方面。

结论

PACT-Q是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估患者对抗凝治疗的期望和满意度,以及他们对治疗使用便利性的看法。其两部分结构——第一部分在基线时评估期望,第二部分评估便利性、负担和治疗满意度——经过验证,显示出良好且稳定的心理测量学特性。这些结果不足以推荐将满意度作为临床试验的主要终点;需要进一步的验证工作来支持对PACT-Q维度得分的解释。然而,首次验证使PACT-Q成为临床和药物流行病学研究以及实际生活研究中适用的测量工具。

试验注册

(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00067093、NCT00062803和NCT00070655)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f8/2686675/7e74918ea8a7/1477-7525-7-30-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验