Ip Stanley, Lichtenstein Alice H, Chung Mei, Lau Joseph, Balk Ethan M
Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):474-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00007.
Measures of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions have been proposed as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
To review published studies that reported relationships between LDL subfractions and cardiovascular outcomes.
MEDLINE (1950 to 5 January 2009), CAB Abstracts (1973 to 30 June 2008), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd quarter of 2008), limited to English-language studies.
3 reviewers selected longitudinal studies with 10 or more participants that reported an association between LDL subfractions and incidence or severity of cardiovascular disease and in which plasma samples were collected before outcome determination.
Data were extracted from 24 studies. The 10 studies that used analytical methods available for clinical use (all of which used nuclear magnetic resonance) had full data extraction, including quality assessment (good, fair, or poor). All studies were extracted by 1 researcher and verified by another.
All 24 studies, and the subset of 10 nuclear magnetic resonance studies, were heterogeneous in terms of the specific tests analyzed, analytical methods used, participants investigated, and outcomes measured. Higher LDL particle number was consistently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, independent of other lipid measurements. Other LDL subfractions were generally not associated with cardiovascular disease after adjustment for cholesterol concentrations. No study evaluated the incremental value of LDL subfractions beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors or their test performance.
Publication bias was a possibility.
Higher LDL particle number has been associated with cardiovascular disease incidence, but studies have not determined whether any measures of LDL subfractions add incremental benefit to traditional risk factor assessment. Routine use of clinically available LDL subfraction tests to estimate cardiovascular disease risk is premature.
低密度脂蛋白(LDL)亚组分的检测已被视为心血管疾病的独立危险因素。
综述已发表的有关LDL亚组分与心血管疾病结局之间关系的研究。
MEDLINE(1950年至2009年1月5日)、CAB文摘数据库(1973年至2008年6月30日)以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2008年第二季度),仅限于英文研究。
3位评审员挑选了参与者不少于10名的纵向研究,这些研究报告了LDL亚组分与心血管疾病发病率或严重程度之间的关联,且血浆样本在结局判定前采集。
从24项研究中提取数据。10项使用临床可用分析方法(均采用核磁共振)的研究进行了完整的数据提取,包括质量评估(优、良或差)。所有研究均由1名研究人员提取数据,并由另一名人员进行核实。
所有24项研究以及10项核磁共振研究的子集,在分析的具体检测项目、使用的分析方法、研究的参与者以及测量的结局方面均存在异质性。较高的LDL颗粒数始终与心血管疾病风险增加相关,与其他血脂测量指标无关。在调整胆固醇浓度后,其他LDL亚组分通常与心血管疾病无关。没有研究评估LDL亚组分相对于传统心血管危险因素的增量价值或其检测性能。
可能存在发表偏倚。
较高的LDL颗粒数与心血管疾病发病率相关,但研究尚未确定LDL亚组分的任何检测指标是否能为传统危险因素评估带来额外益处。常规使用临床可用的LDL亚组分检测来评估心血管疾病风险尚不成熟。