• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴发性肝衰竭患者的动静脉pH差异与组织缺氧

Arterial-venous pH differences and tissue hypoxia in patients with fulminant hepatic failure.

作者信息

Wendon J A, Harrison P M, Keays R, Gimson A E, Alexander G, Williams R

机构信息

Liver Unit, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1991 Nov;19(11):1362-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199111000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199111000-00010
PMID:1935154
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A recent report suggested that, for hypotensive patients, tissue acidemia is best monitored by simultaneous estimates of arterial pH, mixed venous pH, and bicarbonate. This method of detecting tissue acidemia may therefore apply to fulminant hepatic failure patients, who are known to have a high frequency of covert tissue hypoxia. In the present study, both arterial pH and mixed venous pH and bicarbonate were compared in 22 patients with fulminant hepatic failure. Blood samples were drawn from the pulmonary artery and radial artery and this blood was analyzed to determine oxygen delivery and consumption. The arterial pH, mixed venous pH, and bicarbonate were compared using an oxygen flux test to determine the optimal method of demonstrating tissue hypoxia in this group of patients.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

The Liver Unit of our institution.

PATIENTS

Patients (n = 22) with fulminant hepatic failure admitted between January 1989 and January 1990.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were studied before and after an infusion of prostacyclin.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The findings of this study suggest that pH and bicarbonate differences in arterial and mixed venous blood samples were not indicative of tissue hypoxia in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. By contrast, measurement of oxygen consumption after the infusion of prostacyclin, with the demonstrated increase in oxygen uptake, provided a more accurate indication of covert tissue hypoxia.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with a hyperdynamic circulation, such as those patients with fulminant hepatic failure, an oxygen flux test remains the best method of determining the presence of covert tissue hypoxia.

摘要

目的

最近一份报告表明,对于低血压患者,通过同时测定动脉血pH值、混合静脉血pH值和碳酸氢盐来监测组织酸血症最为适宜。因此,这种检测组织酸血症的方法可能适用于暴发性肝衰竭患者,已知这类患者隐匿性组织缺氧的发生率很高。在本研究中,对22例暴发性肝衰竭患者的动脉血pH值、混合静脉血pH值及碳酸氢盐进行了比较。从肺动脉和桡动脉采集血样,并对这些血液进行分析以测定氧输送和氧消耗。使用氧通量试验比较动脉血pH值、混合静脉血pH值和碳酸氢盐,以确定在这组患者中显示组织缺氧的最佳方法。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

我们机构的肝病科。

患者

1989年1月至1990年1月收治的22例暴发性肝衰竭患者。

干预措施

在输注前列环素前后对患者进行研究。

测量与结果

本研究结果表明,暴发性肝衰竭患者动脉血和混合静脉血样本中的pH值和碳酸氢盐差异并不表明存在组织缺氧。相比之下,输注前列环素后测定氧消耗,并显示氧摄取增加,能更准确地表明隐匿性组织缺氧。

结论

在患有高动力循环的危重症患者中,如暴发性肝衰竭患者,氧通量试验仍然是确定是否存在隐匿性组织缺氧的最佳方法。

相似文献

1
Arterial-venous pH differences and tissue hypoxia in patients with fulminant hepatic failure.暴发性肝衰竭患者的动静脉pH差异与组织缺氧
Crit Care Med. 1991 Nov;19(11):1362-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199111000-00010.
2
Assessing acid-base status in circulatory failure. Differences between arterial and central venous blood.评估循环衰竭时的酸碱状态。动脉血与中心静脉血的差异。
N Engl J Med. 1989 May 18;320(20):1312-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905183202004.
3
Effects of vasopressor agents and epoprostenol on systemic hemodynamics and oxygen transport in fulminant hepatic failure.
Hepatology. 1992 Jun;15(6):1067-71. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840150616.
4
Effects of N-acetylcysteine on tissue oxygenation in patients with multiple organ failure and evidence of tissue hypoxia.N-乙酰半胱氨酸对多器官功能衰竭及存在组织缺氧证据患者组织氧合的影响。
Eur Respir J. 1997 Sep;10(9):1962-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10091962.
5
Effect of ventilation on acid-base balance and oxygenation in low blood-flow states.低血流状态下通气对酸碱平衡和氧合的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1827-34.
6
Cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal complications of fulminant hepatic failure.
Semin Liver Dis. 1986 May;6(2):119-28. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040595.
7
Opposite effects of prostacyclin on hepatic blood flow and oxygen consumption after burn and sepsis.前列环素对烧伤和脓毒症后肝血流量及氧耗的相反作用。
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103073.65311.c8.
8
Lactic acidosis in fulminant hepatic failure. Some aspects of pathogenesis and prognosis.暴发性肝衰竭中的乳酸酸中毒。发病机制和预后的某些方面。
J Hepatol. 1985;1(4):405-16. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(85)80778-9.
9
A comparison between the Fick method and indirect calorimetry for determining oxygen consumption in patients with fulminant hepatic failure.Fick法与间接测热法在暴发性肝衰竭患者氧耗量测定中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;26(7):1200-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199807000-00020.
10
[Changes in acid-base equilibrium and CO2 output induced by bicarbonate infusion].[碳酸氢盐输注引起的酸碱平衡和二氧化碳排出量的变化]
Minerva Anestesiol. 2000 Sep;66(9):627-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of CO-derived variables in critically ill patients.一氧化碳衍生变量在危重症患者中的应用。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Sep 25;15(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01569-2.
2
Acute Liver Failure.急性肝衰竭
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2020 Oct 7;16(Suppl 1):45-55. doi: 10.1002/cld.957. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Mystery of PCO Gap in Sepsis.脓毒症中肺泡-毛细血管氧分压差的奥秘
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;23(10):443-444. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23260.
4
How can CO-derived indices guide resuscitation in critically ill patients?一氧化碳衍生指标如何指导重症患者的复苏?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(Suppl 11):S1528-S1537. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.10.
5
Central venous to arterial pCO2 difference in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克中心静脉至动脉 pCO2 差值。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Aug;124(15-16):500-3. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0213-2. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
6
Hemodynamic management of cardiovascular failure by using PCO(2) venous-arterial difference.通过利用 PCO(2)动静脉差值对心血管衰竭进行血液动力学管理。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Oct;26(5):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9381-x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Hyperlactatemia in patients with non-acetaminophen-related acute liver failure.非对乙酰氨基酚相关急性肝衰竭患者的高乳酸血症
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar 28;12(12):1949-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i12.1949.