Pennock B E, Kaplan P D, Carlin B W, Sabangan J S, Magovern J A
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh 15212.
Chest. 1991 Nov;100(5):1371-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.5.1371.
Thirty-one consecutive patients with respiratory failure in whom treatment with intubation and mechanical ventilation was being strongly considered received alternative ventilatory support by means of a BiPAP ventilatory support system and nasal mask. Laboratory measurements and physical findings were documented before and 1 h after initiation of support. This support improved patient comfort, slowed respiratory rate, and improved oxygenation. Support lasted from 2 h to six days. Seventy-six percent (22/29) of patients recovered from this episode of respiratory failure, avoiding alternative mechanical ventilatory support. There were no complications associated with aspiration, gastric distention, or acute separation from support.
31例呼吸衰竭患者正在被强烈考虑采用插管和机械通气治疗,通过双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)支持系统和鼻面罩接受了替代通气支持。在支持开始前和开始后1小时记录实验室测量结果和体格检查结果。这种支持改善了患者的舒适度,降低了呼吸频率,并改善了氧合。支持持续时间从2小时至6天。76%(22/29)的患者从这次呼吸衰竭发作中康复,避免了替代机械通气支持。未出现与误吸、胃扩张或支持突然中断相关的并发症。