Meduri G U, Abou-Shala N, Fox R C, Jones C B, Leeper K V, Wunderink R G
Pulmonary, and Critical Care Division, University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Chest. 1991 Aug;100(2):445-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.2.445.
Mechanically assisted intermittent positive-pressure ventilation effectively provides ventilatory support in patients with respiratory failure but it requires placing an artificial airway. We have previously reported our successful experience delivering mechanical ventilation via a face mask (FMMV) rather than with an endotracheal tube in a pilot study of patients with acute respiratory failure. The present investigation evaluated an additional 18 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure to determine the efficacy of FMMV in a more homogeneous group and to determine factors predicting its success. FMMV was successful in avoiding intubation in 13 of the 18 patients. A significant initial improvement in PCO2 (greater than 16 percent decrease) and in pH (from less than 7.30 to greater than 7.30) predicted success. The five patients who failed on FMMV required endotracheal intubation because of inability to improve gas exchange (three patients), apnea due to sedatives (one patient), and management of secretions (one patient). FMMV was generally well accepted with only two patients withdrawn because of intolerance of the mask. The mean duration of FMMV was 25 h. Complications were seen in only two patients (11 percent): aspiration (one patient) and mild skin necrosis (one patient). Seven patients entered the study by meeting entrance criteria after an unsuccessful extubation attempt and therefore received both forms of mechanical ventilation. All but one patient avoided reintubation, and the face mask proved to be as effective as the endotracheal tube as a conduit for delivering the mechanical tidal volume and improving gas exchange. Our findings indicate that FMMV is a viable option for short-term (one to four days) ventilatory support of patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure and insufficiency.
机械辅助间歇正压通气能有效为呼吸衰竭患者提供通气支持,但需要置入人工气道。我们之前在一项针对急性呼吸衰竭患者的初步研究中报告了经面罩进行机械通气(FMMV)而非经气管插管进行机械通气的成功经验。本研究评估了另外18例高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭患者,以确定FMMV在更同质的患者群体中的疗效,并确定预测其成功的因素。18例患者中有13例通过FMMV成功避免了气管插管。初始时PCO₂显著改善(下降超过16%)以及pH改善(从低于7.30升至高于7.30)可预测成功。18例患者中有5例FMMV失败,其中3例因无法改善气体交换、1例因镇静剂导致呼吸暂停、1例因分泌物管理问题而需要气管插管。FMMV总体上被广泛接受,仅有2例患者因面罩不耐受而退出。FMMV的平均持续时间为25小时。仅2例患者(11%)出现并发症:1例误吸,1例轻度皮肤坏死。7例患者在拔管尝试失败后符合入组标准进入研究,因此接受了两种形式的机械通气。除1例患者外,所有患者均避免了再次插管,面罩作为输送机械潮气量和改善气体交换的管道,被证明与气管插管同样有效。我们的研究结果表明,FMMV是高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭和呼吸功能不全患者短期(1至4天)通气支持的可行选择。