Amano Toshiyuki, Nakamizo Akira, Mishra Sandip K, Gumin Joy, Shinojima Naoki, Sawaya Raymond, Lang Frederick F
Department of Neurosurgery, Unit 442, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2009 May;92(3):357-71. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9844-1. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
Understanding the mechanism underlying p53's ability to induce cell cycle arrest versus apoptosis is critical to treating human gliomas, 70% of which contain wild-type p53. Although N-terminal phosphorylation results in activation of p53, the role of N-terminal phosphorylation, particularly at serines 15 and 20, in p53's ability to induce cell cycle arrest versus apoptosis remains controversial. Here we test the hypothesis that phosphorylation of serine 15 and/or 20 is causally related to p53-mediated apoptosis in human gliomas. Introduction of p53 plasmids containing alanine mutations at serine 15 or/and serine 20 (which block phosphorylation) or aspartate mutations (which mimic phosphorylation) at the same sites, implicated simultaneous phosphorylation of both sites in the induction of apoptosis. When a double phosphorylation-mimicking adenoviral p53 vector (Ad-p53-15D20D) was compared with an unphosphorylated p53 vector (Ad-p53), treatment with Ad-p53 resulted in G1-arrest, whereas Ad-p53-15D20D induced apoptosis. These effects occurred independent of phosphorylation of other N-terminal serine (i.e., serines 6, 9, 33, 37, 46) indicating that phosphorylation of S15 and S20 is sufficient for inducing apoptosis. Mechanistically, Ad-p53 was capable only of increasing the expression of p21/CIP, whereas Ad-p53-15D20D increased the binding to and expression of the pro-apoptotic genes Fas, Puma and PIG3. However, Ad-p53-15D20D did not alter the expression of Noxa, Bid, IGFBP3, PERP and Killer/DR5, suggesting that phosphorylation of S15 and S20 resulted in the expression of specific pro-apoptotic gene. In conclusion, simultaneous phosphorylation of S15 and S20 is causally associated with apoptosis, resulting in increased expression of specific p53-responsive pro-apoptotic genes.
了解p53诱导细胞周期停滞与凋亡的潜在机制对于治疗人类神经胶质瘤至关重要,因为70%的人类神经胶质瘤含有野生型p53。虽然N端磷酸化会导致p53激活,但N端磷酸化,特别是丝氨酸15和20处的磷酸化,在p53诱导细胞周期停滞与凋亡能力方面的作用仍存在争议。在此,我们检验了丝氨酸15和/或20的磷酸化与人类神经胶质瘤中p53介导的凋亡存在因果关系这一假设。引入在丝氨酸15或/和丝氨酸20处含有丙氨酸突变(可阻断磷酸化)或天冬氨酸突变(可模拟磷酸化)的p53质粒,表明这两个位点的同时磷酸化参与了凋亡诱导过程。当将双磷酸化模拟腺病毒p53载体(Ad-p53-15D20D)与未磷酸化的p53载体(Ad-p53)进行比较时,用Ad-p53处理导致G1期停滞,而Ad-p53-15D20D诱导凋亡。这些效应的发生与其他N端丝氨酸(即丝氨酸6、9、33、37、46)的磷酸化无关,表明S15和S20的磷酸化足以诱导凋亡。从机制上讲,Ad-p53仅能增加p21/CIP的表达,而Ad-p53-15D20D增加了与促凋亡基因Fas、Puma和PIG3的结合及表达。然而,Ad-p53-15D20D并未改变Noxa、Bid、IGFBP3、PERP和Killer/DR5的表达,这表明S15和S20的磷酸化导致了特定促凋亡基因的表达。总之,S15和S20的同时磷酸化与凋亡存在因果关联,导致特定p53反应性促凋亡基因的表达增加。